Religious language as natural-sacred language

Authors

  • Massoud Toossi Saeidi Institution for Humanities and Cultural Studies
  • Seyed Hassan Hossini Sharif University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.114

Abstract

The article offers a different interpretation of Antony Flew’s views about the problem of religious language. This interpretation shows that Flew’s ideas can be perceived as a critique of belief in the content of religious statements, rather than a critique of their meaning. By interpreting his thought in this way, it is clear that Flew’s approach is not new and we can find similar ideas in the history of theological thought. In connection with this interpretation, the authors analyze prevalent theories related to this problem in order to identify the principal doctrines used to find a new solution. In this regard, the new potential solution is assessed in order to complete the approach previously undertaken. The main idea is to merge two distinct and also contrasting concepts found in the literature: “natural” and “sacred”. Such a merging can begin with the concept of natural language as a theory drawn from the literature on the philosophy of language. According to the principles of the philosophy of language adopted by this article, religious language is rooted in natural language, but it is distinct from other forms in that it is the customized use of natural language by the saints of a particular religion. By offering an explanation to natural language, it is possible to view saints as the ones who used natural language in order to talk about the divine sacred realm. Similar to previous thinkers who spoke about religious language, the authors offer their own analogy. This analogy is compared and contrasted with previous ones to reveal the advantages of the proposed new view of the problem of religious language. The authors propose a new type of natural language with the special characteristic of being sacred.

Keywords:

religious language, sacred knowledge, natural language, saints, natural-sacred language

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Flew, A. and Varghese, R. A. (2008), There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind, New York: Harper One.

2. Alston, W. P. (2005), Religious Language, in Wainwright, W. J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–242.

3. Stiver, D. R. (1996), The Philosophy of Religious Language: Sign, Symbol and Story, Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Publishers.

4. Flew, A., Hare, R. M. and Mitchell, B. (1964), Theology and Falsification: The University Discussion, in Flew, A. (ed.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, New York: Macmillan.

5. Hick, J. H. (1989), Philosophy of Religion, 4th ed., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Pearson.

6. Plantinga, A. (1990), God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

7. Yandell, K. E. (1971), Basic issues in the philosophy of religion, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

8. Harris, J. F. (2013), Analytic Philosophy of Religion, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science and Business Media.

9. Meister, C. (2018), Philosophy of Religion, in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP). Available at: https://www.iep.utm.edu/religion/ H1m (accessed: 01.02.2020).

10. Alston, W. P. (1986), Perceiving God, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 655–665.

11. Crombie, I. M. (1955), Theology and Falsification, in New Essays in Philosophical Theology, New York: Macmillan, pp. 109–30.

12. Wisdom, J. (1944), Gods, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 45, pp. 185–206.

13. Ramsey, I. T. (1963), Religious Language an Empirical Placing of Theological PhrasesI, New York: Macmillan.

14. Braithwaite, R. B. (1955), An Empiricist’s View of the Nature of Religious Belief, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Tillich, P. (1973), Systematic Theology, vol. 1, Princeton, N. J.: University of Chicago Press.

16. Soskice, J. M. (1987), Metaphor and Religious Language, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

17. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009), Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

18. Ayatollahy, H. (2012), Islamic Philosophical Approach to the Problem of Meaningfulness of Religious Statements, in Pourhasan, G. (ed.), Religious Language and Belief of God, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies Directions Save, pp. 13–39.

19. Hosseni Sarvary, S. H. (2012), Reviewing the Most Important Theories About Religious Language and the Theory of Natural Language, in Pourhasan, G. (ed.), Religious Language and Belief of God, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies Directions Save, pp. 83–105.

20. Dinparast, M. (2012), The Basis of Sacred Knowledge in Seyed Hossein Nasr Thoughts, in Pourhasan, G. (ed.), Religious Language and Belief of God, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies Directions Save, pp. 253–280.

21. Ghafari, H. (2013), The Place of the Philosophy of Religion in the Tradition of Islamic Philosophy According to Avicenna, Philosophy of Religion Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 47–64.

22. Alston, W. P. (1982), Religious experience and religious belief, Noûs, vol. 16, pp. 3–12.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Toossi Saeidi, M., & Hassan Hossini, . S. (2021). Religious language as natural-sacred language. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(1), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.114

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Religious studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.