Philosophy of literature and the methodology of studying of poetic texts: In honor of the 80th anniversary of professor V. S.Nikonenko

Authors

  • Sergei V. Nikonenko St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.312

Abstract

The article deals with the anniversary of an eminent historian of Russian philosophy V. S.Nikonenko (1942–2013), who is the author of well-known works, a member of St Petersburg State University. The author of the article presents the theory of analysis of philosophical content of poetic texts, created in late Nikonenko’s works. Studying Pushkin’s and Zhukovsky’s poetry, Nikonenko asserts that Russian literature reached the new stage of self-consciousness in the beginning of the 19th century. It was not only a literature, but it has become a worldviewing paradigm of Russian thought. A poet thinks not in metaphysical, but in concrete image form. A poetical image is not a concept. It is a symbol expressed in verbal eidetic pattern. Pushkin is a propagandist of the general moral, political and metaphysical ideas presenting in symbolical poetical images. However, it is very difficult to rationalize poetic images at all. Pushkin’s typical heroes are ideal patterns and eidetic images of contemporary men. The specificity of poetic image is the possibility to interpret it in many conceptual dimensions. A poetic image is unknown in rational form: it is understood irrationally. Nikonenko holds the romantic theory of the impossibility of recognizing the essence of poetic image by poets and literal heroes. Pushkin expresses his ideal content in specific symbolic form of the prophecy. He uses verbal poetic symbols which could be analyzed only in a week sense because they are metaphors and not concepts. So poetic truths are not the logical ones. They are sentences having only apparent logical proofs. Shortly speaking, poetic sentences may be certain, but they are not true ones. To sum up, Nikonenko works hermeneutic method of interpretation of poetic texts, according to it philosophical content of poetry can be extracted only from the linguistic textual structure.

Keywords:

V. S.Nikonenko, 80th anniversary, philosophy of literature, poetical text, V. A. Zhukovskiy, A. S. Pushkin, St Petersburg philosophy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Никоненко, В.С. (2014), Труды по русской философии и литературе, СПб.: Изд-во РХГА.

Оукшотт, М. (2002), Рационализм в политике и другие статьи, М.: Идея-Пресс.

Уайтхед, А.Н. (1990), Избранные работы по философии, М.: Прогресс.

Белинский, В.Г. (1981), Собрание сочинений, т. 6, М.: Художественная литература.

Писарев, Д.И. (1956), Сочинения, т. 3, М.: Государственное издательство художественной литературы.

Соловьев, В.С. (1988), Сочинения, т. 2, М.: Мысль.

Анкерсмит, Ф.Р. (2007), Возвышенный исторический опыт, М.: Европа.

Рорти, Р. (1996), Случайность, ирония и солидарность, М.: Русское феноменологическое общество.

Хайдеггер, М. (2003), Разъяснения к поэзии Гёльдерлина, СПб.: Академический проект.

Анкерсмит, Ф.Р. (2003), История и тропология: взлет и падение метафоры, М.: ПрогрессТрадиция.

Никоненко, В.С. (1985), Николай Александрович Добролюбов, М.: Мысль.


References

Nikonenko, V. S. (2014), Works on Russian Philosophy and Literature, St Petersburg: RKhGA Publ. (In Russian)

Oakeshott, M. (2002), Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, Moscow: Ideia-Press Publ. (In Russian)

Whitehead, A.N. (1990), Collected Works on Philosophy, Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Belinskij, V.G. (1981), Collected works, vol. 6, Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Pisarev, D.I. (1956), Collected works, vol. 3, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury Publ. (In Russian)

Soloviev, V. S. (1988), Collected works, vol. 2, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Ankersmit, F.R. (2007), Sublime Historical Experience, Moscow: Evropa Publ. (In Russian)

Rorty, R. (1996), Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Moscow: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo Publ. (In Russian)

Heidegger, M. (2003), Comments on Herderlin’s Poetry, St Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

Ankersmit, F.R. (2003), History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor, Moscow: ProgressTraditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Nikonenko, V. S. (1985), Nikolay Aleksandrovich Dobrolyubov, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

Nikonenko, S. V. (2022). Philosophy of literature and the methodology of studying of poetic texts: In honor of the 80th anniversary of professor V. S.Nikonenko. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.312