From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy

Authors

  • Anatoly S. Kolesnikov St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Cholpon E. Alieva International University of Kyrgyzstan, 17A/1, ul. L.Tolstogo, Bishkek, 720007, Kyrgyzstan; International University “Ala-Too”, 1/8, ul. Ankara, Tunguch, Bishkek, 720048, Kyrgyzstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.403

Abstract

The radical change in the status of non-Western philosophical traditions was the trigger for the development of the methodology for studying philosophy between cultures, the revision of the nature of philosophy itself, which is a matter of metaphilosophy. Hermeneutic works appear on the fundamental fabric of philosophical ideas — basic concepts, their relationship to other ways of thinking, considering their potential and alternative productive lines. Thus, the history of comparative philosophy, through its stages, is formed into a single scheme of complementary philosophical activity and a single comprehensive metaphilosophical project. It is revealed through an “archival” approach (exploring single philosophical traditions in parallel), “equivalent” (comparing the existing traditions in the context of analogies and contrasts), and “problem solving” (using many traditions to provide philosophical solutions), and through a comprehensive hermeneutic project of “cartographic” concepts and their possibilities. This constitutes a theory of philosophy that draws on multiple perspectives of the interconnected traditions of East and West, implicitly participating in mapping the underlying eidetic structure on which philosophy does its work, and outlining conceptual possibilities around any idea. There is a need to study the ability of philosophy to form a broader hermeneutic understanding of the field of concept, giving rise to each philosophical problem, comprehended in their strengths and weaknesses and in connection with alternative configurations — under traditions, conditions, periods and cultures A view of global philosophy is formed, which brings us back to the old idea that philosophy stays above pragmatic goals, it takes on the eidetic fabric of ideas of the world — past, present, possible — as an object of a special kind of hermeneutic understanding, including applied problems in a broader speculative frame, that is, cleaned up through a comparison of radically different approaches. It is here, in philosophy as a study of the “structure of ideas themselves”, that we will see a multicultural philosophy proving its indispensability.

Keywords:

comparative philosophy, intercultural project, metaphilosophy, philosophy of fusion, hermeneutic cartography

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература/References

Fleming, J. (2003), Comparative Philosophy: its aims and methods, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, vol. 30, iss. 2 (June), pp. 259–270.

Warren, F. (2016), Thinking through Hall and Ames: on the art of comparative philosophy, Dao, vol. 15, pp. 563–574.

Pang-White, A. A. (2006), Analogy and Comparative Philosophy: A Hermeneutic Retrieval of Confucius and Aquinas, SACP FORUM Asian and Comparative Philosophy, vol. 23, no. 47, pp. 126–145.

Holenstein, E. (2003), A Dozen Rules of Thumb for Avoiding Intercultural Misunderstandings. Available at: http://them.polylog.org/4/ahe-en.htm (accessed: 15.09.2021).

Dussel, E. (2009), A New Age in the History of Philosophy: The World Dialogue between Philosophical Traditions,Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 35, pp. 499–516.

Mall, R.A. (2000), Intercultural Philosophy, Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Mall, R.A. (2016), Intercultural Philosophy: A Conceptual Clarification, Confluence: Journal of World Philosophies, vol. 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/confluence/article/ view/514 (accessed: 15.09.2021).

Kimmerle, H. (1994), Die Dimension der Interkulturellen, Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Kimmerle, H. (2007), Was leistet interkulturelle Philosophie? Antworten von Heinz Kimmerle, Hans Jörg Sandkühler und Georg Stenger, Information Philosophie, no. 4. Available at: https://www.information-philosophie.de/index.php/de/arbeitsbereiche/dclps/related-research-centers/download/BLB3BJ%20 0,500%20Bayerische%20Landesbank%2020.05.2025%207,14%2093,80%20EUR%20%20?a=1&t=651&n=2 (accessed: 15.09.2021).

Wimmer, F.M. (2004), Interkulturelle Philosophie, Vienna: UTB.

Stepanyants, M.T. (2015), From Eurocentrism to Intercultural Philosophy, Voprosy Filosofii, vol. 10, pp. 150–162. (In Russian)

Agbakoba, J. (2014), Intercultural Philosophy and the Question of African Identity: An ‘Afrocontructivist’ Perspective, in: Sweet, W. (ed.), What is Intercultural Philosophy. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/31935868/_Book_What_is_Intercultural_Philosophy_2014_ (accessed: 15.09.2021).

Raju, P.T. (1962), Introduction to Comparative Philosophy, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Mall, R.A. and Hulsmann, H. (1989), Die drei Geburtsortre der Philosophie: China, Indien, Europa, Bonn: Bouvier.

Lenk, H. and Paul, G. (2014), Transculturelle Logic, Bochum: Projektverlag

Neville, Robert C. (2002), Beyond Comparative to Integrative Philosophy, APA Newsletter on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies, vol. 2, no. 1, ed. by Chenyang Li, pp. 20–23.

Allinson, R.E. (2001), The Myth of Comparative Philosophy or the Comparative Philosophy Malgré Lui, in: Mou, B. (ed.), Two Roads to Wisdom? Chinese and Analytical Philosophical Traditions, Chicago: Open Court, pp. 269–292.

Deutsch, E. and Larson, G.J. (eds), (1988), Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Scharfstein, B.-A. (1998), ,A Comparative History of World Philosophy: From the Upanishads to Kant, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Solomon, R.C. and Higgins, K.M. (eds), (2003), From Africa to Zen: An Invitation to World Philosophy, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Blocker, G.H. (1999), World Philosophy: An East-West Comparative Introduction to Philosophy, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Jullien, F. (2000), Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece, New York: Zone Books.

Chakrabarti, A. and Weber, R. (eds), (2016), Comparative Philosophy without Borders, London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Rošker, J. (2021), Interpreting Chinese Philosophy: A New Methodology, London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Ambrogio, S. (2021), ,Chinese and Indian Ways of Thinking in Early Modern European Philosophy: The Reception and the Exclusion, London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Mou, B. (2010), On Constructive-Engagement strategy of Comparative Philosophy: A Journal Theme Introduction, Comparative Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–32.

Mou, B. (ed.) (2001), Two Roads to Wisdom? — Chinese and Analytic Philosophical Traditions, Chicago: Open Court.

Moeller, Hans-Georg. (2018), On Comparative and Post-Comparative Philosophy, in: Behuniak, J. (ed.), Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T.Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 31–45.

Hoecke, M. van (2021), Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Jin, Y.Park. (ed.) (2009), Comparative political theory and cross-cultural philosophy: Essays in honor of Hwa Yol Jung, London: Lexington Books.

Garfield, J.L. and Van Norden, B.W. (2016), If Philosophy Don’t Diversify, Let’s Call It What It Really Is, New York Times, May, 11. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/opinion/if-philosophywontdiversify-lets-call-it-what-it-really-is.html (accessed: 12.05. 2020).

Spivac, G. (1997), A memoir, in: Bilimoria, P. and Mohanty, J.N. (eds), Relativism, Suffering and Beyond: Essays in Memory of Bimal K.Matilal, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 372–375.

Matilal, B.K. (1986), Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bilimoria, P. and Hemmingson, M. (eds), (2016), Comparative Philosophy and J.L. Shaw, Dordrecht: Springer

Frazier, J. (2019), The view from above: a theory of comparative philosophy, Religious Studies, vol. 56, iss. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–17.

Frazier, J. (2019), “Speakers of highest truth”: conceptual plurilogues in the Early Upanisads, in: Black, B. and Ram-Prasad, C. (eds), Dialogue with Classical Indian Traditions: Encounter, Transformation and Interpretation, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 84–104.

Sivin, N. (2011), On cultural manifolds: a new approach to research on ancient science, Fudan Journal: Social Sciences Edition, vol. 6, pp. 55–61.

Sivin, N., Akasoy, A., Anderson, W., Colas, G. and Eh, E. (2018), What kinds of comparison are most useful in the study of world philosophies?, Journal of World Philosophies, vol. 3, pp. 75–97.

Towards Post-Comparative Philosophy: Interview with Ralph Weber by Nevad Kanteran, (2021), Asian Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 211–221.

Coquereau, E. (2016), From Comparative to Fusion Philosophy, Journal of World Philosophies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 152–154. Available at: http://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp (accessed: 20.05.2019).

Spivac, G.C. (1999), A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Towards a History of the Vanishing Present, Harvard University Press, pp. 237–238.

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Kolesnikov, A. S., & Alieva, C. E. (2022). From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(4), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.403