The schism in postnonclassical rationality

Authors

  • Yuri V. Loskutov Perm State University, 15, Bukireva ul., Perm, 614068, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.103

Abstract

Ontological, epistemological, socio-practical, and ethical aspects demonstrate the impossibility of the coexistence of the complex idea of human dimensionality with the complex idea of nonlinearity in the “hard core” of postnonclassical research programs. The idea of human dimensionality, which necessarily has a real paradigmatic status in postnonclassical science, seriously limits the worldview ideas of nonlinearity in favor of linear concepts. The claim of the worldview of nonlinearity to paradigmatic status in postnonclassics leads to the loss of compatibility of this idea with the idea of human dimensionality, which demonstrates the groundlessness of this claim. In the ontological aspect, the human being is seen as a result and a condition for the continuation of a linear world process. The epistemological aspect notes the insufficiency of any reductionist cognitive strategy to ensure the unity of human knowledge, and states the immaturity of the current state of social synergetics. In the socio-practical aspect, the project as the main type of linear activity, which occupies a central place in human culture, is opposed to the game as the main type of non-linear activity. At the same time, the anti-project nature of reliance on nonlinear processes is noted. In the ethical aspect, the incompatibility of postnonclassical rationality with ethical relativism, naturally arising from the claim of the idea of nonlinearity to paradigmatic status, is considered. Present in the “hard core” of the postnonclassical research programs the complex idea of human dimensionality can be protected by different elements of the “protective belt”: on the one hand, either by the emphasis on the study of linear processes or by the emphasis on the study of nonlinear processes (using a “soft,” non-paradigmatic variant of the idea of nonlinearity); on the other hand, either by means of synergetics, or by means of concrete-universal dialectics.

Keywords:

postnonclassical rationality, human dimensionality, nonlinearity, social synergetics, dialectics, practice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Стёпин, В.С. (2003), Теоретическое знание, М.: Прогресс — Традиция.

Князева, Е.Н. и Курдюмов, С.П. (2011), Синергетика: Нелинейность времени и ландшафты коэволюции, М.: КомКнига.

Афанасьева, В.В. и Анисимов, Н.С. (2015), Постнеклассическая онтология, Вопросы философии, № 8, с. 28–41.

Горковенко, И.А. и Стрельченко, В.И. (2010), Идея научной картины мира: постнеклассическая рациональность, Вестник Ленинградского государственного университета им. А.С.Пушкина, т. 2. № 2, с. 133–141.

Худяков, Д.С. (2006), Концепт «знание» в контексте постнеклассической науки, дис. … канд. филос. наук, Томск, 148 с.

Лешкевич, Т.Г. (1998), Постнеклассическая методология: эволюция парадигмы фундаментальной философии, Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 7. Философия, № 6, с. 52–70.

Афанасьева, В.В. и Анисимов, Н.С. (2013), Нелинейное развитие социума: постнеклассический анализ, Власть, № 1, с. 68–71.

Попов, В.В. и Щеглов, Б.С. (2012), Постнеклассическая реальность как формирование новой философской парадигмы, Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук, № 2, с. 136–140.

Флиер, А.Я. (2017), Классическая, неклассическая и постнеклассическая культуры: опыт новой типологии, Горизонты гуманитарного знания, № 3, с. 25–33. https://doi.org/10.17805/ggz.2017.3.3

Лоскутов, Ю.В. (2020) Атрибуты материи и логически отрицательные понятия, Новые идеи в философии, № 7 (28), с. 63–68.

Стёпин, В.С. (2003), Саморазвивающиеся системы и постнеклассическая рациональность, Вопросы философии, № 8, с. 5–17.

Орлов, В.В. (1978), Развитие материи как закономерный процесс, в: Развитие материи как закономерный процесс, Пермь: Изд-во Пермского университета, с. 5–51.

Килис, Ю.А. (2011), Синергетический акцент на случайности, Омский научный вестник, № 2 (96), с. 70–74.

Назаретян, А.П. (2004), Универсальная перспектива творческого интеллекта в свете постнеклассической методологии, в: Вызов познанию, М.: Наука, с. 394–433.

Jantsch, E. (1980), The Self-Organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution, New York: Pergamon Press.

Морен, Э. (2005), Метод. Природа Природы, M.: Прогресс — Традиция.

Князева, Е.Н. и Курдюмов, С.П. (2002), Основания синергетики. Режимы с обострением, самоорганизация, темпомиры, СПб.: Алетейя.

Астафьева, О.Н. и Добронравова, И.С. (2009), Социокультурная синергетика в России и Украине: предметная область, история и перспективы, в: Постнеклассика: философия, наука, культура, СПб.: Мiръ, с. 634–669.

Аршинов, В.И. (1999), Синергетика как феномен постнеклассической науки, М.: ИФРАН.

Хакен, Г. (2009), Самоорганизующееся общество, в: Синергетическая парадигма. Социальная синергетика, М.: Прогресс-Традиция, с. 350–369.

Добронравова, И.С. (2009), Постнеклассическая рациональность и философские основания синергетической методологии, Постнеклассика: философия, наука, культура, СПб.: Мiръ, с. 296–314.

Назаретян, А.П. (2012), Антропология насилия и культура самоорганизации: Очерки по эволюционно-исторической психологии, М.: Либроком.

Прохоров, М.М. (2012), Наука постнеклассической эпохи, Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И.Лобачевского, № 1 (3), с. 64–70.

Беляева, Е.В. (2017), Синергетические закономерности социокультурной динамики нравственности, Научные труды республиканского института высшей школы, № 16, с. 208–215.


References

Stepin, V. S. (2003), Theoretical knowledge, Moscow: Progress — Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Kniazeva, E.N. and Kurdiumov, S.P. (2011), Synergetics: Nonlinearity of Time and Landscapes of Coevolution, Moscow: KomKniga Publ. (In Russian)

Afanas’eva, V.V. and Anisimov, N. S. (2015), Postnonclassical Ontology, Voprosy filosofii, no. 8, pp. 28–41. (In Russian)

Gorkovenko, I.A. and Strel’chenko, V.I. (2010), The Idea of a Scientific Picture of the World: Postnonclassical Rationality, Pushkin Leningrad State University journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 133–141. (In Russian)

Khudiakov, D. S. (2006), The concept of “knowledge” in the context of postnonclassical science, Thesis, Tomsk. (In Russian)

Leshkevich, T.G. (1998), Postnonclassical Methodology: Evolution of the Fundamental Philosophy Paradigm, Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy, no. 6, pp. 52–70. (In Russian)

Afanas’eva, V.V. and Anisimov, N. S. (2013), Nonlinear Development of Society: A Postnonclassical Analysis, Vlast’, no. 1, pp. 68–71. (In Russian)

Popov, V.V. and Shcheglov, B.S. (2012), Postnonclassical Reality as the Formation of a New Philosophical Paradigm, Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, no. 2, pp.136–140. (In Russian)

Flier, A.Ya. (2017), Classical, nonclassical, and postnonclassical culture: the experience of a new typology, The Horizons of Humanities Knowledge, no. 3, pp. 25–33. https://doi.org/10.17805/ggz.2017.3.3 (In Russian)

Loskutov, Yu. V. (2020), Attributes of matter and logically negative concepts, Novye idei v filosofii, no. 7 (28), pp. 63–68. (In Russian)

Stepin, V. S. (2003), Self-Developing Systems and Postnonclassical Rationality, Voprosy filosofii, no. 8, pp. 5–17. (In Russian)

Orlov, V.V. (1978), The development of matter as a natural process, in: Razvitie materii kak zakonomernyi protsess, Perm, PGU Publ., pp. 5–51. (In Russian)

Kilis, Iu. A. (2011), Synergetic emphasis on randomness, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, no. 2 (96), pp. 70–74. (In Russian)

Nazaretian, A.P. (2004), The Universal Perspective of Creative Intelligence in the Light of Postnonclassical Methodology, in: Vyzov poznaniiu, Moscow: Nauka Publ., рр. 394–433. (In Russian)

Jantsch, E. (1980), The Self-Organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution, New York: Pergamon Press.

Morin, E. (2005), Method. Nature of Nature, Moscow: Progress — Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Kniazeva, E.N. and Kurdiumov, S.P. (2002), Foundations of Synergetics. Regimes with aggravation, self-organization, time-worlds, St Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Astaf ’eva, O.N. and Dobronravova, I. S. (2009), Sociocultural Synergetics in Russia and Ukraine: Subject Area, History, and Perspectives, in: Postneklassika: filosofiia, nauka, kul’tura, St Petersburg: Mir Publ., pp. 634–669. (In Russian)

Arshinov, V.I. (1999), Synergetics as a phenomenon of postnonclassical science, Moscow: IFRAN Publ. (In Russian)

Haken, G. (2009), Self-organizing Society, in: Sinergeticheskaia paradigma. Sotsial’naia sinergetika, Moscow: Progress — Traditsiia Publ., pp. 350–369. (In Russian)

Dobronravova, I. S. (2009), Postnonclassical rationality and philosophical foundations of synergetic methodology, in: Postneklassika: filosofiia, nauka, kul’tura, St Petersburg: Mir Publ., pp. 296–314. (In Russian)

Nazaretian, A.P. (2012), Anthropology of Violence and Culture of Self-Organization: Essays on Evolutionary-Historical Psychology, Moscow: Librocom, Publ. (In Russian)

Prokhorov, M.M. (2012), Science of the Postnonclassical Era, Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, no. 1 (3), pp. 64–70. (In Russian)

Beliaeva, E.V. (2017), Synergetic regularities of the sociocultural dynamics of morality, Nauchnye trudy respublikanskogo instituta vysshei shkoly, no. 16, pp. 208–215. (In Russian)

Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, Том 38, No 1, 2022

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16

How to Cite

Loskutov, Y. V. (2022). The schism in postnonclassical rationality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.103

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.