Moral culture and social tension

Authors

  • George P. Artemov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Anna G. Pinkevich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.207

Abstract

The article analyzes the influence of the moral culture of the Russian population on social tension. Moral culture is considered as a system of interpersonal attitudes that characterize the ability of members of a social community to maintain relationships of mutual trust, mutual respect and mutual assistance. The empirical basis of the study is the data of the AllRussian surveys conducted by the Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI) within the framework of the Russian Social Research under the European Social Research Program in 2006 and 2018. As indicators of moral culture are used variables that reflect the cautious or trusting attitude of respondents to most people; an assessment of the self-serving or honest attitude of most people to respondents; an assessment by respondents of the ratio of people focused on caring only for themselves or helping others. Variables that reflect negative assessments by respondents of the state of economic, social, political etc., as well as negative assessments of the impact of immigrants on the different spheres of life in countries are considered as indicators of social tension. Based on the use of statistical methods of data analysis, it was found that negative assessments of the state of spheres of life and the influence of immigrants on these spheres are less characteristic of respondents who trust the majority of people, are confident in the honesty of most people and their desire to help each other. A comparative analysis of changes in indicators of moral culture and social tension in the period from 2006 to 2018 in the country as a whole and in individual federal districts of the country shows that an increase of the value of moral culture indicators is accompanied by a decrease in the value of the social tension considered indicators.

Keywords:

moral culture, social tension, risks, indicators of moral culture, indicators of social tension, social solidarity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Артёмов, Г.П. (2016), Нравственная культура: определение и типы, Дискурсы этики, Альманах, вып. 1 (12), с. 76–91.

Лаптенок, А.С. (2012), Нравственное развитие личности в условиях современной культуры, в: Социализация личности на разных этапах возрастного развития: опыт, проблемы, перспективы: материалы I республиканской научной конференции, Гродно: ГрГУ им. Я.Купалы, с. 51–54.

Рукавишников, В.О. (2008), Межличностное доверие: измерение и межстрановые сравнения, Социологические исследования, № 2, с. 17–25.

Uslaner, E.M. (2002), The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Штомпка, П. (2012), Доверие — основа общества, М.: Логос.

Дюркгейм, Э. (1990), О разделении общественного труда. Метод социологии. М.: Наука.

Баранова, Г.В. и Фролов, В.А. (2012), Методология и методика измерения социальной напряженности, Социологические исследования, № 3, с. 50–64.

Galtung, J. (1998), Peace by peaceful means. Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization, Oslo: International Peace Research Institute, 1998.

Нагайцев, В.В. и Пустовалова Е.В. (2010), Уровень социальной напряжённости и конфликтности в системе показателей социального благополучия населения региона, Известия Алтайского государственного университета, № 2–2 (66), с. 209–212.

European Social Survey source questionnaire (2006). URL: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/methodology/ess_methodology/source_questionnaire/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).

Европейское социальное исследование (2018). URL: http://www.ess.ru.ru./fileadmin/templates/doc/Wave_9_2018/Anketa_RSS_volna_9_Rossija.pdf (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).

Институт сравнительных социальных исследований (ЦЕССИ) (2006), Российская часть 3-й волны Европейского социального исследования (ESS), База: Datafile-intem-08-08-rus lab. URL: www.essru.ru (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).

Институт сравнительных социальных исследований (ЦЕССИ) (2018), Российская часть 9-й волны Европейского социального исследования (ESS), База: data_RSS wave9-Russia_rus labels_international ver 01. URL: www.ess-ru.ru (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).

Штомпка, П. (2001), Культурная травма в посткоммунистическом обществе, Социологические исследования, 2001, № 1, с. 3–12.

Всемирное исследование ценностей (WVS) (2014), База 1981–2014. WVS_Longitudinal_1981-2014_spss_v_2014_11_25. URL: http://www.worldvaluessurvay.org/ (дата обращения: 20.12.2022).


References

Artyomov, G.P. (2016), Moral culture: definition and types, Discourses of ethics. Almanac, vol. 1 (12), pp. 76–91. (In Russian)

Laptenok, A. S. (2012), Moral development of the individual in the conditions of modern culture. Socialization of the individual at different stages of age development: experience, problems, prospects, Materials of the I Republican Scientific Conference, ed. by Mikhalevich, N.V., Grodno: GrGU im. I.Kupala Publ., pp. 51–54. (In Russian)

Rukavishnikov, V.O. (2008), Interpersonal Trust: Measurement and Cross-Country Comparison, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 2, pp. 17–25. (In Russian)

Uslaner, E.M. (2002), The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sztompka, P. (2012), Trust is the basis of society, Moscow: Logos Publ. (In Russian)

Durkheim, E. (1990), On the division of social labor. Method of sociology. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Baranova, G.V. and Frolov, V.A. (2012), Methodology and methods of measuring social tension, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 3, pp. 50–64. (In Russian)

Galtung, J. (1998), Peace by peaceful means. Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization, Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.

Nagaitsev, V.V. and Pustovalova, E.V. (2010), The level of social tension and conflict in the system of indicators of the social well-being of the population of the region, Izvestiia Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2-2 (66), pp. 209–212. (In Russian)

European Social Survey source questionnaire (2006). Available at: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/metodology/ess_methodology/source_questionnaire/ (accessed: 10.12.2022). (In Russian)

European Social Survey (2018). Available at: http://www.ess.ru.ru./fileadmin/templates/doc/Wave_9_2018/Anketa_RSS_volna_9_Rossija.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2022). (In Russian)

Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI)(2006), Russian part of the 3rd wave of the European Social Survey (ESS), Base: Datafile-intem-08-08-rus lab. Available at: https://www.ess-ru.ru (accessed: 10.12.2022). (In Russian)

Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI) (2018), The Russian part of the 9th wave (2018) of the European Social Survey (ESS), Base: data_RSS wave9-Russia_rus labels_international ver 01. Available at:www.ess-ru.ru (accessed: 10.12.2022). (In Russian)

Sztompka, P. (2001), Cultural Trauma in a Post-Communist Society, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2001, no. 1, pp. 3–12. (In Russian)

World Values Survey (WVS) (2014), Base 1981-2014. WVS_Longitudinal_1981-2014_ spss_v_2014_11_25. Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvay.org/ (accessed: 20.12.2022).

Published

2023-06-29

How to Cite

Artemov, G. P., & Pinkevich, A. G. (2023). Moral culture and social tension. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.207