Virtual reality and the problem of illusion

Authors

  • Ilya I. Dokuchayev St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Kirill S. Golokhvast Siberian Federal Scientific Center for Agrobiotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 26, ul. Centralnaya, Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk Region, 630501, Russian Federation
  • Aleksey M. Sokolov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.102

Abstract

The paper touches upon the problem of differentiating between virtual reality and original reality. The article makes a contribution to the modern ontology, as it discusses the problem of the status of virtual reality, which is formed by modern technical and mathematical means using cognitive technologies. The work is based on the concepts of E.Husserl and H.Putnam, as well as theories of psychophysiology and cognitive sciences. Arguments are provided for the following opposing statements: that it is possible to differentiate between them and that it is not. To specify the distinctive features of virtual reality, the latter is described as a system of perceived existing things and in comparison to other forms of such systems: subjective and objective, individual and social, natural and cultural, material and ideal, original and fictional, abstract and transcendental, evident and illusionary, true and false, erroneous and imitative, deceitful and mistaken, performative and simulating, conditional and unconditional ones. This part of the article qualifies virtual reality as illusion created via imitation. It is further revealed that the key distinctive feature of original reality, which is defined in the modern phenomenology as the maximal level of evidence, is applicable to virtual reality as well. The major argument in favor of the provable difference between virtual and original reality, which the contemporary analytic philosophy offers, can be confuted by means of a thought experiment based on the doubling of virtual reality. The final part of the article discusses psychological (experiment-based cognitive) arguments in favor of differentiating between virtual and original reality successfully: effect of presence and immersion. Both effects are typical of the reality types under comparison, as well as of experiencing these realities. The paper concludes that neither philosophy nor cognitive sciences can offer a compelling argument to differentiate between original reality and virtual reality.

Keywords:

original reality, virtual reality, simulated reality, illusionary reality, problem of the Matrix, problem of evidence, effect of presence, immersion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Adolphs, T.C. (2018), Digitization of the World: A Phenomenology of Digitization, Open Access Dissertation, Michigan: Michigan Technological University. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/641

Bondecka-Krzykowska, I. (2012), Remarks on Ontology of Virtual Reality, Filozofia Nauk, vol. 20 (4), pp. 139–153.

Kim, J. (2001), Phenomenology of Digital-Being, Human Studies (Intertexts: Philosophy, Literature and the Human Sciences in Korea), vol. 24 (1/2), pp. 87–111.

Ropolyi, L. (2016), Virtuality and Reality — Toward a Representation Ontology, Philosophies, vol. 1, pp. 40–54. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies1010040

Toit, J.D. (2021), Introduction — Phenomenology and virtuality, Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, vol. 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2021.1896236

Putnam, H. (2002), Reason, truth and history, transl. by Dmitriyev, T. A. and Lebedev, M. V., Moscow: Prakis Publ. (In Russian)

Husserl, E. (1984), Logische Untersuchungen, zweiter Band, erster Teil, Untersuchungen zur Phenomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Den Haag: Nijhoff Verlag.

Cummings, J.J. and Bailenson, J.N. (2015), How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence, Media Psychology, vol. 19 (2), pp. 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1 080/15213269.2015.1015740

Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2023. Т. 39. Вып. 1

Downloads

Published

2023-04-20

How to Cite

Dokuchayev, I. I., Golokhvast, K. S., & Sokolov , A. M. (2023). Virtual reality and the problem of illusion . Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.102

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.