Russian traditionalism as a principle of Russian modernization

Authors

  • Сергей Васильевич Полатайко Institution of the Russian Academy of Sciences Saint Petersburg Academic University, 8/3, Khlopina Str, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.113

Abstract

The article focuses on the role of Russian traditionalism in the formation of national identity in Russia and especially its actualization from a historical perspective. Based on the ideas of N. Danilevsky and KN Leontiev, the author defends the thesis that the logic of national reality expresses its structural contents. This is the essence of the national tradition whose stability is set out as productive interaction through, on the one hand, conditional objective factors (natural) and, on the other, relatively subjective (mental, moral) factors. And if the first, being passive, is tradition, the second, its activity, is determined. The article stresses that any self-knowledge is an expression of active attitude of the people in the first case to itself through correlation of the activity (its goals and forms) with the objective order of things. The Russian-Russian understanding can be  understood as the identification of stable, reproducible regularly, structural relationships in their natural and artificial relativity.

Keywords:

civilization strategy, national tradition, bio-politics, identity, the Russian revolution, modernization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Шопенгауэр А. Мир как воля и представление. М.: Московский клуб 1992. 395 с.

Данилевский Н. Я. Россия и Европа М.: Институт русской цивилизации 2008. 816 c.

Леонтьев К. Н. Византизм и славянство // Леонтьев К. Н. Полн. собр. соч. и писем: в 12 т. СПб.: Владимир Даль 2004. Т. 7 кн. 1. С. 300–443.

Бердяев Н. А. Константин Леонтьев. Очерки из истории русской религиозной мысли // Константин Леонтьев. Pro et contra. СПб.: Изд-во Русского Христианского гуманитарного института 1995. Кн. 2. С. 29–179.

Кузнецов Н. В. Соколов А. М. Историософия столицы и естественно-исторические интуиции в русской науке // Философия в Петербурге: вчера сегодня завтра. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургская из- дательско-книготорговая фирма «Наука» 2015. С. 138–150.

Бердяев Н. А. Истоки и смысл русского коммунизма. М.: Наука 1990. 224 с.

Булычев Ю. Ю. Христианская философия нации и проблемы русского культурного самосознания. СПб.: СПбГПУ 2004. 295 с.

References

Shopengauer A. Mir kak volia i predstavlenie [World as Will and Representation]. Moskow Mos-kovskii klub Publ. 1992. 395 p. (In Russian)

Danilevskii N. Ia. Rossiia i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moskow Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii 2008. 816 p. (In Russian)

Leont’ev K. N. [Byzantium and the Slavs]. Leont’ev K. N. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem [Collected works and letters] in 12 vols. St. Petersburg Vladimir Dal’ Publ. 2004. T. 7 book 1 pp. 300–443. (In Russian)

Berdiaev N. A. [Konstantin Leontiev. Sketches from the history of religious Russian-term think-ing]. Konstantin Leont’ev Pro et contra. St. Petersburg Izd-vo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo in-stituta1995 vol. 2 pp. 29–179. (In Russian)

Kuznetsov N. V. Sokolov A. M. [Historiosophy of the capital and the natural history of intuition in Russian science]. Filosofiia v Peterburge: vchera segodnia zavtra [Philosophy in St. Petersburg: yesterday today and tomorrow]. St. Petersburg Nauka Publ.2015 pp. 138–150. (In Russian)

Berdiaev N. A. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma [The origins and meaning of Russian commu-nism]. Moscow Nauka Publ. 1990. 224 p. (In Russian)

Bulychev Iu. Iu. Khristianskaia filosofiia natsii i problemy russkogo kul’turnogo samosoznaniia [Christian philosophy of the nation and the problems of the Russian cultural consciousness]. St. Petersburg St. Petersburg State Politechnic University Press 2004. 295 p. (In Russian)

Published

2018-09-24

How to Cite

Полатайко, С. В. (2018). Russian traditionalism as a principle of Russian modernization. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 33(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.113