Philosophical Justification of Bonapartism by Napoleon III

Authors

  • Artem A. Krotov Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.409

Abstract

The article analyzes the leading social and philosophical ideas on which Louis Bonaparte, officially called Napoleon III after the proclamation of the Second Empire in France, relied in his political activity. Key concepts of Bonapartism are considered: stability, independence, equality, unity of all classes in the empire, political leader as an exponent of the people’s will, savior of the fatherland capable of establishing order in society. The article analyzes Napoleon III’s ideas about progress and popular sovereignty. Long before occupying the highest state post, he proposed to base the future constitution of the country on ”three authorities“: the people (to elect the head of state, to authorize his acts), the legislative corps, and the emperor. In criticizing Republican rule, he saw its flaw in defending undeserved privileges as seen throughout history, in his view. He attributed Napoleon I the idea of creating European confederation of free peoples, denying the widespread idea that the emperor sought to establish a worldwide monarchy. Referring to the difference in the characters of peoples, mores, and climatic conditions of different countries, he called for refusing to copy foreign institutions, English and American ones. France, according to Napoleon III, has its own path in history; according to his ideas, it should be at the head of the civilization movement. In an effort to chart this path, he spoke of equality, property, and religion as crucial elements of social being. Progress, in his opinion, requires a periodic revision of the legislation, therefore, the transformation of the empire from authoritarian to liberal could be interpreted not as a forced measure, but as a pre-planned political initiative.

Keywords:

Bonapartism, social philosophy, theory of popular sovereignty, forms of government, Napoleon III

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Desternes, S. and Chandet, H. (1961), Napoléon III.Homme du XX siècle, Paris: Hachette.

Napoléon III (1856), Œuvres, vols I–IV, Paris: Plon.

Bonaparte, N.-L. (1840), Affaire de Boulogne. Discours du prince Napoléon-Louis devant la Cour des Pairs, prononcé dans la séance du 28 septembre 1840, Paris: Imprimerie de l’Urtubie.

Наполеон (1956), Избранные произведения, М.: Воениздат.

Napoléon I (1858–1870), Correspondance. Publ. par ordre de l’empereur Napoléon III, vols I–XXXII, Paris: Plon.

Napoléon III (1865–1866), Histoire de Jules César, vols 1–2, Paris: Plon.

Водовозов, В.В. (1992), Наполеон III, в: Энциклопедический словарь. Ф.А.Брокгауз — И.А.Ефрон, т. 40, М.: Терра, с. 548–553.

Napoléon III (1870), Discours de l’empereur, prononcé à l’occasion de la proclamation solennelle du plébiscite du 8 mai 1870, Angers: Imp. P.Lachèse, Belleuvre et Dolbeau.

Маркс, К. (1985), Восемнадцатое брюмера Луи Бонапарта, в: Маркс, К.и Энгельс, Ф., Избранные произведения: в 3 т., т. 1, М.: Политиздат, с. 418–516.

Гюго, В. (1953–1956), Собрание сочинений: в 15 т., М.: Гослитиздат.

Anceau, E. (2008), Napoléon III.Un Saint-Simon à cheval, Paris: Tallandier.

Pradalié, G. (1974), Le second empire, Paris: PUF.

Bluche, F. (1981), Le bonapartisme, Paris: PUF.

Bordonove, G. (1998), Napoléon III, Paris: Pygmalion.

Dansette, A. (1961), Louis- Napoléon à la conquête du pouvoir, Paris: Hachette.

Lahlou, R. (2006), Napoléon III ou l’obstination couronnée, Paris: B.Giovanangeli.

Glikman, J. (2011), Louis-Napoléon prisonnier. Du fort Ham aux ors des Tuileries, Paris: Aubier.

Girard, L. (2013), Napoléon III, Paris: Fayard.

Черкасов, П.П. (2015), Александр II и Наполеон III.Несостоявшийся союз (1856–1870), М.: КМК.


References

Desternes, S. and Chandet, H. (1961), Napoléon III.Homme du XX siècle, Paris: Hachette.

Napoléon III (1856), Œuvres, vols I–IV, Paris: Plon.

Bonaparte, N.-L. (1840), Affaire de Boulogne. Discours du prince Napoléon-Louis devant la Cour des Pairs, prononcé dans la séance du 28 septembre 1840, Paris: Imprimerie de l’Urtubie.

Napoléon I (1956), Selected works, Moscow: Voenizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Napoléon I (1858–1870), Correspondance. Publ. par ordre de l’empereur Napoléon III, vols I–XXXII, Paris: Plon.

Napoléon III (1865–1866), Histoire de Jules César, vols 1–2, Paris: Plon.

Vodovozov, V.V. (1992), Napoléon III, in: Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. F. A. Brokgauz — I.A.Efron, vol. 40, Moscow: Terra Publ., pp. 548–553. (In Russian)

Napoléon III (1870), Discours de l’empereur, prononcé à l’occasion de la proclamation solennelle du plébiscite du 8 mai 1870, Angers: Imp. P.Lachèse, Belleuvre et Dolbeau.

Marx, K. (1985), The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, in: Marx, K. and Engels, F., Izbrannye proizvedeniia: in 3 vols, vol. 1, Moscow: Politizdat Publ., pp. 418–516 (In Russian)

Hugo, V. (1953–1956), Collected works: in 15 vols, Moscow: Goslitizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Anceau, E. (2008), Napoléon III.Un Saint-Simon à chevalс, Paris: Tallandier.

Pradalié, G. (1974), Le second empire, Paris: PUF.

Bluche, F. (1981), Le bonapartisme, Paris: PUF.

Bordonove, G. (1998), Napoléon III, Paris: Pygmalion.

Dansette, A. (1961), Louis- Napoléon à la conquête du pouvoir, Paris: Hachette.

Lahlou, R. (2006), Napoléon III ou l’obstination couronnée, Paris: B.Giovanangeli.

Glikman, J. (2011), Louis-Napoléon prisonnier. Du fort Ham aux ors des Tuileries, Paris: Aubier.

Girard, L. (2013), Napoléon III, Paris: Fayard.

Cherkasov, P. P. (2019), Alexandre II and Napoléon III.Failed union (1856–1870), Moscow: KMK Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2023-12-23

How to Cite

Krotov, A. A. (2023). Philosophical Justification of Bonapartism by Napoleon III . Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(4), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.409