Религиозные практики урегулирования конфликтов в секуляризированном обществе XXI в.: анахронизм или актуальная традиция?

Ilshat A. Mukhametzaripov; Vadim E. Kozlov

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2024.407

Authors

Ilshat A. Mukhametzaripov Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, 20, ul. Baumana, Kazan, 420111, Russian Federation; Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 18, ul. Kremlevskaya, Kazan, 420008, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-5369
Vadim E. Kozlov Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 18, ul. Kremlevskaya, Kazan, 420008, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-152X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.407

Abstract

The practices of resolving conflict situations in religious associations are based on dogmatics and the unique historical experience of the formation of religious communities. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism have developed principles and norms for negotiation, mediation, arbitration and adjudication in the event of interpersonal, intra-group and intergroup conflicts between co-believers. Each tradition emphasizes different forms of dispute resolution: judging in Judaism, conciliation and mediation in Christianity, mediation and arbitration in Islam, and Buddhism, but they are all united by the desire for peaceful settlement, justice and non-violence. However, due to historical characteristics, ancient traditions do not always coincide with the requirements of modern society. The principles of equality of the parties, adversarial process, transparency, confidentiality and independency of mediators and judges are understood differently because of the supremacy of sacred institutions and the interests of the religious community. In this connection, forms of revival and integration of religious traditions of conflict resolution within a secularized society become relevant, including the increasing interest in “social values” by political elites in a number of countries (Great Britain, France, Russia). The interest of states, on the one hand, is social cohesion and respect for the law, and, on the other hand, the noticeable activization of religious communities which can complement the regulatory functions of the state, including eliminating contradictions between religious and secular norms, preventing violations of laws, discrimination and religious radicalism.

Keywords:

religion, secularism, digital society, conflict resolution, negotiation, arbitration, adjudication

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Борисова, Е.А. (ред.) (2019), Альтернативное разрешение споров, М.: Городец.

Котлярова, В.В. (2021), Альтернативные способы урегулирования и разрешения споров в России, Самара: Изд-во Самар. ун-та.

Бобровников, В.О. и Ярлыкапов, А.А. (2013), Реституция шариата на российском Кавказе: проблемы и перспективы, Pax Islamica, № 2 (11), с. 61–92.

Варшавер, Е. и Круглова, Е. (2015), «Коалиционный клинч» против исламского порядка: динамика рынка институтов разрешения споров в Дагестане, Экономическая политика, № 3, с. 89–112.

Казенин, К.И. (2016), Конкуренция институциональных регуляторов в городской среде Северного Кавказа, М.: РАНХиГС.Казенин, К.И. (2016), Конкуренция институциональных регуляторов в городской среде Северного Кавказа, М.: РАНХиГС.

Сюкияйнен, Л.Р. (2021), Исламское право и диалог культур в современном мире, М.: Изд-во ВШЭ.

Клейменов, А.Я. (2013), Религиозный суд (арбитраж) в системе альтернативного урегулирования споров, Закон, № 2, с. 58–66.

Ведяев, А.В. (2021), Нормативное регулирование деятельности церковного суда в Русской Православной Церкви: история, современное состояние, проблемы и перспективы, Христианское чтение, № 3, с. 305–320.

Мухаметзарипов, И.А. (2022), Религиозные суды, арбитражи и органы медиации в постсекулярную эпоху, Казань: Фэн.

Baker, A.M. (2012), A higher authority: Judicial review of religious arbitration, Vermont Law Review, vol. 37, p. 157–202.

Broyde, M.J. (2017), Sharia tribunals, rabbinical courts, and christian panels. Religious arbitration in America and the West, New York: Oxford University Press.

Wolfe, C.L. (2006), Faith-based arbitration: Friend or foe? An evaluation of religious arbitration systems and their interaction with secular courts, Fordham Law Review, vol. 75, no. 1, p. 427–469.

Macklin, A. (2013), Multiculturalism meets privatization: The case of faith-based arbitration, International Journal of Law in Context, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 343–365.

Helfand, M.A. (2011), Religious arbitration and the new multiculturalism: Negotiating conflicting legal orders, New York University Law Review, vol. 86, no. 5, p. 1231–1305.

Boulding, K.E. (1988), Conflct and defense. A general theory, Lanham: University Press of America.

Darendorf, R. (1959), Class and class conflict in industrial society, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Marsden, L., Jarvis, L. and Atakav, E. (2022), That still goes on, doesn’t it, in their religion?’ British values, Islam and vernacular discourse, Nations and Nationalism, vol. 29, iss. 1, p. 229–245.

Jachter, Ch. Beit Din, pesharah in theory and in practice. URL: https://www.sefaria.org/Gray_Matter_II%2C_Beit_Din%2C_Pesharah_in_Theory_and_in_Practice.26-27?ven=Gray_Matter,_by_Chaim_Jachter._Teaneck,_N.J,_2000-2012&lang=en (дата обращения: 29.01.2024).

Цыпин, В.А. (2009), Каноническое право, М.: Изд-во Сретенского монастыря.

Lecker, M. (2004), The “Constitution of Medina”: Muhammad’s first legal document, Princeton: The Darwin Press, Inc.

The Buddhist monastic code (2013), transl. by Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Metta Forest Monastery

References

Borisova, E.A. (ed.) (2019), Alternative dispute resolution, Moscow: Gorodets Publ. (In Russian)

Kotlyarova, V.V. (2021), Alternative methods of settling and resolving disputes in Russia, Samara: Izdatel’stvo Samarskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

Bobrovnikov, V.O. and Yarlykapov, A.A. (2013), Restitution of Sharia in the Russian Caucasus: problems and prospects, Pax Islamica, no. 2 (11), pp. 61–92. (In Russian)

Varshaver, E. and Kruglova, E. (2015), “Coalition clinch” against the Islamic order: market dynamics of dispute resolution institutions in Dagestan, Ekonomicheskaia politika, no. 3, pp. 89–112. (In Russian)

Kazenin, K.I. (2016), Competition of institutional regulators in the urban environment of the North Caucasus, Moscow: RANHiGS Publ. (In Russian)

Sykiyainen, L.R. (2021), Islamic law and dialogue of cultures in the modern world, Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (In Russian)

Kleimenov, A.Ya. (2013), Religious court (arbitration) in the system of alternative dispute resolution, Zakon, no. 2, pp. 58–66. (In Russian)

Vedyaev, A.V. (2021), Normative regulation of the activities of the church court in the Russian Orthodox Church: history, current state, problems and prospects, Khristianskoe chtenie, no. 3, pp. 305–320. (In Russian)

Mukhametzaripov, I.A. (2022), Religious courts, arbitration and mediation bodies in the post-secularera, Kazan’: Fen Publ. (In Russian)