The problem of conflict in the historical and philosophical dimension

Authors

  • Сергей Иванович Дудник St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Игорь Дмитриевич Осипов St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.201

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of conflict in the history of Western philosophy. In this context, encompasses different periods in the development of Western philosophy. Analyzed concepts of Plato and Aristotle and argues that the ancient philosophy of the conflict based on a synthesis of the mythological and philosophical ideas, on ideas about the necessity of harmony in the relationship of man with nature and justice social policy in the state. The causes of the revolution in society seen in the violation of this balance. The article examines the understanding of conflicts in the Middle Ages in connection with the peculiarities of Christian ethics. It is shown that this view was mainly due to the opposition of soul and body, teaching on the sinful human nature. This philosophy can be defined as the concept of intrapersonal conflicts, which required appropriate practices to overcome conflicts. Also analyzed the concept of conflict in this New time, even in the era of modernization. In particular, analyzed the philosophy of Locke, Kant, D. S. Mill, Hegel and Marx, and the concepts of conflict G. Simmel, L. Kozer, R. Dahrendorf. It is shown that the rationalistic philosophy of man and ethics of egoism largely contributed to the development of the theory of personality in which the inconsistency of its nature is seen as natural and positive as contributing to the progress of society. The concepts of constitutionalism, democracy and the rule of law, reflected a fundamental change in the philosophy of the conflict.

Keywords:

philosophy, conflict, society, history, personality, freedom

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Диоген Лаэртский. О жизни, учениях и изречениях знаменитых философов. М.: Мысль, 1979, 620 с.

Платон. Соч.: в 3 т. М.: Мысль, 1972. Т. 3, ч. 2. 687 с.

Античные риторики. М.: МГУ, 1978. 352 с.

Локк Д. Соч.: в 3 т. М.: Мысль, 1988. Т. 3. 668 c.

Милль Д. С. О свободе // Антология западноевропейской классической либеральной мысли. М.: Наука, 1995. С. 288–392.

Хофмайстер Х. Воля к войне, или Бессилие политики. Философско-политический трактат. СПб.: Гуманитарная Академия, 2006. 286 c.

Гегель Г. В. Ф. Философия права. М.: Соцэкгиз, 1934. 377 с.

Дудник С. И. Маркс против СССР. СПб.: Наука, 2013. 304 с.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест Коммунистической партии. М.: Прогресс, 1986. 72 с.

Зиммель Г. Человек как враг // Психология конфликта: Хрестоматия. 2-е изд. / под общ. ред. Н. В. Гришиной. СПб.: Питер, 2008. С. 18–25.

Козер Л. Функции социального конфликта. М.: Идея-Пресс, 2000. 208 c.

Дарендорф Р. Современный социальный конфликт. Очерк политики свободы. М.: РОССПЭН, 2002. 288 c.

Философия русской революции: Коллективная монография / под ред. И. Д. Осипова, С. Н. Погодина. СПб.: Изд-во Политехнического университета, 2017. 188 с.

References

Diogenes of Laerte. O zhizni, ucheniiakh i izrecheniiakh znamenitykh filosofov [On the life, conceptions and sayings of famous philosophers]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1979. 620 p. (In Russian)

Plato. Sochineniia [Works], in 3 vols. Vol. 3, pt. 2. Moscow, Mysl’, 1972. 687 p. (In Russian)

Antichnye ritoriki [Antique rhetoric]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1978. 352 p. (In Russian)

Lokk D. Sochineniia [Works], in 3 vols. Vol. 3. Moscow, Mysl’1988. 668 p. (In Russian)

Mill D. S O svobode [About freedom]. Antologiia zapadnoevropeiskoi klassicheskoi liberal’noi mysli [Anthology of the West European classical liberal thought]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1995, pp. 288–392. (In Russian)

Hofmeister H. Volia k voine, ili Bessilie politiki. Filosofsko-politicheskii traktat [Will to war, or the impotence of politics]. St. Peterburg, Gumanitarnaia Akademiia Publ., 2006. 286 p. (In Russian)

Gegel G. V. F. Filosofiia prava [Philosophy of law]. Moscow, Sotsekgiz Publ., 1934. 377 p. (In Russian)

Dudnik S. I. Marks protiv SSSR [Marx against the Soviet Union]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2013. 304 p. (In Russian)

Marx K., Engels F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoi partii [Manifest of Communist party]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986. 72 p. (In Russian)

Zimmel G. Chelovek kak vrag [Man as an enemy]. Psikhologiia konflikta [Psychology of the conflict], 2nd ed., under the General editorship of N. V. Grishina. St. Peterburg, Piter Publ., 2008, pp. 18–25. (In Russian)

Coser L. Funktsii sotsial’nogo konflikta [The Functions of social conflict]. Moscow, Ideia-Press, 2000. 208 p. (In Russian)

Dahrendorf R. Sovremennyi sotsial’nyi konflikt. Ocherk politiki svobody [The Modern social conflict. Essay on politics of liberty]. Moscow ROSSPEN, 2002. 288 p. (In Russian)

Filosofiia russkoi revoliutsii [The philosophy of the Russian revolution], Collective Monograph. Eds I. D. Osipov, S. N. Pogodin. St. Peterburg, Izdatelstvo Politechnicheskogo Universiteta. 188 p. (In Russian)

Published

2018-09-27

How to Cite

Дудник, С. И., & Осипов, И. Д. (2018). The problem of conflict in the historical and philosophical dimension. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.201

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3