REVISITING THE ETHICS OF LAW

Authors

  • Евгений Викторович Держивицкий St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Игорь Юрьевич Ларионов St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Вадим Юрьевич Перов St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.404

Abstract

In this article, the main approaches to the understanding of the subject and the peculiarities of the ethics of law are considered. An attempt is made to defi ne the specifi cs of the ethics of law in the broad context of the relation between morality and law. Th e key issues and challenges for the investigation of the institutionalized form of professional legal ethics are identifi ed. Th e reasons are given why the equation of applied legal ethics with professional legal ethics is not justifi ed. We argue that the subordination of law to morality as well as the formal rational interpretation of the law leads to the destruction of law. Subsequently the particular characteristics of legal ethics, which pose vital requirements on personal professional competence, are identifi ed and the concept of “legal culture” is analyzed. Reasons are considered why reliance on the moral aspect of professional work in the fi eld of justice becomes one of the essential conditions of its legitimacy. We describe the circumstances that interfere with professional activity, namely an individual’s diffi culty resolving the collision between determining the scope of how one is permitted to act and the right course of action, a disposition to moral relativism, and practical problems that do not have certain clear moral solutions. Th e contradiction between law and morality can take the form of confl ict. We argue that normative consent in society is important for practices sanctioned with the help of law. Th is article also provides a methodological analysis of the basic philosophical problems that arise at the junction of morality and law (the so-called problem of the relationship between morality and law and the concept of the law as the minimum of morality, guaranteed by the state). Also the problem of the conceptual relation of morality and law in the social conscience as well as the question of the possibility of the legal restriction of citizens’ rights and freedoms for the sake of some moral ideal are scrutinized. Likewise the possibility of legal regulation of morals and moral reeducation using the legal arrangements are drawn into question. Th e role of the discussions between the “natural law” and “positive law” approaches should be taken into account. We argue that the theoretical extremities of both jusnaturalism and legal positivism can complicate the relations of morality and law in professional activities. In this paper, we suggest the use of the concept of “normative gap” that should be distinguished from the confl ict of law. Th e article explains the idea that ethics of law with the “normative gap” as its subject matter will provide the moral content and secure the value of law. Refs 4.

Keywords:

Legal ethics, ethics of law, legal professional ethics, lawyer ethics, morality, law, natural law, positive law, normative gap

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Новгородцев П. И. Нравственный идеализм в философии права // О свободе. Антология мировой либеральной мысли (I половина ХХ века). М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. С. 591–637.

Соловьев В. С. Оправдание добра. Нравственная философия // Соловьев В. С. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1990. Т. 1. С. 103–113.

Новгородцев П. И. Право и нравственность // Правоведение. 1995. № 6. С. 103–113.

Гоббс Т. Левиафан, или Материя, форма и власть государства церковного и гражданского // Гоббс Т. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1991. Т. 2. С. 74–81.

References

Novgorodtsev P. I. Nravstvennyi idealizm v fi losofi i prava [Moral Idealism in the Philosophy of Law]. O svobode. Antologiia mirovoi liberal’noi mysli (I polovina XX veka) [On Liberty. Anthology of World Liberal Th ought (XX c., 1st half)]. Moscow, Progress-Tradiciya Publ., 2000, pp. 591–637. (In Russian)

Solov’ev V. S. Opravdanie dobra. Nravstvennaia fi losofi ia [Justifi cation of the Good. Moral philosophy]. Solov’ev V. S. Sochineniia: v 2 t. T. 1 [Solovev V. S. Works. In 2 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1990, pp. 103–113. (In Russian)

Novgorodtsev P. I. Pravo i nravstvennost’ [Law and Morality]. Pravovedenie [= Jurisprudence, journal for fundamental research on legal theory and practical matters], 1995, no. 6, pp. 103–113. (In Russian)

Gobbs T. Leviafan, ili materiia, forma i vlast’ gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan or Th e Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil]. Gobbs T. Sochineniia: v 2 t. T. 2 [Hobbes T. Works. In 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1991, pp. 74–81. (In Russian)

Published

2018-10-07

How to Cite

Держивицкий, Е. В., Ларионов, И. Ю., & Перов, В. Ю. (2018). REVISITING THE ETHICS OF LAW. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(4), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.404