WHAT IS MEANT BY EXPERIENCE WHEN WE CALL IT AESTHETIC?

Authors

  • Артем Евгеньевич Радеев St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.406

Abstract

Th e subject of this paper is to focus on what the meaning of experience can be used for introducing the concept of aesthetic experience. Th e author underlines that most of the theories of aesthetic experience is aimed at identifying the essence of «aesthetic», ignoring the notion of experience. To develop the idea, the author introduces a tentative defi nition of experience, tracing the way in which its components are related to the concept of aesthetic experience. As a result, the author concludes that there are at least three meanings of the concept of experience that fi t to the analysis of aesthetic experience. Based on this analysis, the author comes to a conclusion about the role of the individual and the representation of experience in the concept of aesthetic experience. Refs 18.

Keywords:

aesthetic experience, tentative definition, Dewey, the individual, the experiencing

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Dewey J. Art as Experience. Tarcher Perigee 2005. 371 p.

Carroll N. Recent Approaches to Aesthetic Experience // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 2013. N 70. P. 165–177.

Goldman A. H. The Broad View on Aesthetic Experience // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criti-cism. 2012. N 71. P. 323–333.

Кенник В. Основывается ли традиционная эстетика на ошибке? // Американская философия искусства: основные концепции второй половины ХХ века — антиэссенциализм перцептуализм институционализм. Антология / пер с англ.; под ред. Б. Дземидока и Б. Орлова. Екатеринбург: Дело-вая книга 1997. С. 87–112.

Dickie G. Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic Experience // The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 62 N 5 (Mar. 4 1965). P. 129–136.

Mead G. H. The Nature of Aesthetic Experience // International Journal of Ethics. Vol. 36 N 4 (Jul. 1926). P. 382–393.

Шустерман Р. Прагматическая эстетика. Живая красота переосмысление искусства. М.: Ка-нон+ 2012. 408 с.

Beardsley M. C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Hackett Publishing Company Inc. 1981. 678 p.

Mitias M. H. What Makes An Experience Aesthetic? Rodopi Bv Editions 1988. 154 p.

Ландгребе Л. Что такое эстетический опыт? // Современная западноевропейская и амери-канская эстетика: Сб. переводов / под ред. Е. Г. Яковлева. М.: Книжный дом «Университет» 2002. С.206–223.

Dufrenne M. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Northwestern Univ. Press 1973. 578 p.

Бычков В. В. Маньковская Н. Б. Метафизические аспекты эстетического опыта // Вестн. сла-вянских культур. 2015. № 1. С. 161–176.

Выготский Л. С. Психология искусства. М.: Искусство 1986. 574 с.

Кривцун О. А. Эстетика. М.: Юрайт 2014. 549 с.

Chinn Peggy L. Kramer Maeona K. Integrated Theory & Knowledge Development in Nursing. Else-vier 2011. 288 p.

Rajendra Kumar Sharma. Sociological Methods and Techniques. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. 1997. 445 p.

Darnell Peter A. Margolis Philip E. C. A Software Engineering Approach. Springer 1996. 498 p.

Радеев А. Е. О том что значит говорить «да» (по Ницше и не только) // Вестн. С.-Петерб. ун-та. Сер. 17. Философия. Конфликтология. Культурология. Религиоведение. 2015. Вып. 1. С. 140–147.

References

Dewey J. Art as Experience. Tarcher Perigee 2005. 371 p.

Carroll N. Recent Approaches to Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism2013 no. 70 pp. 165–177.

Goldman A. H. The Broad View on Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism2012 no. 71 pp. 323–333.

Kennik V. Osnovyvaetsia li traditsionnaia estetika na oshibke? [Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake?]. Amerikanskaia filosofiia iskusstva: osnovnye kontseptsii vtoroi poloviny XX veka — antiessentsi-alizm pertseptualizm institutsionalizm. Antologiia. Transl. from English eds B. Dzemidok B. Orlov. Ekate-rinburg Delovaia kniga Publ.1997 pp. 87–112. (In Russian)

Dickie G. Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Philosophy1965 Mar. 4 vol. 62 no. 5 pp. 129–136.

Mead G. H. The Nature of Aesthetic Experience. International Journal of Ethics1926 (Jul.) vol. 36 no. 4 pp. 382–393.

Shusterman R. Pragmaticheskaia estetika. Zhivaia krasota pereosmyslenie iskusstva [Pragmatist Aes-thetics: Living Beauty Rethinking Art]. Мoscow Kanon+ Publ. 2012. 408 p. (In Russian)

Beardsley M. C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Hackett Publishing Company Inc. 1981. 678 p.

Mitias M. H. What Makes An Experience Aesthetic? Rodopi Bv Editions 1988. 154 p.

Landgrebe L. Chto takoe esteticheskii opyt? [What is an Aesthetic Experience?]. Sovremennaia za-padnoevropeiskaia i amerikanskaia estetika: Sb. perevodov [перевод]. Ed. by E. G. Iakovlev. Moscow Knizh-nyi dom “Universitet”2002 pp. 206–223. (In Russian)

Dufrenne M. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Northwestern University Press 1973. 578 p.

Bychkov V. V. Man’kovskaia N. B. Metafizicheskie aspekty esteticheskogo opyta [Metaphysical Aspects of Aesthetic Experience]. Vestnik slavianskikh kul’tur2015 no. 1 pp. 161–176. (In Russian)

Vygotskii L. S. Psikhologiia iskusstva [Psychology of Art]. Мoscow Iskusstvo Publ. 1986. 574 p. (In Russian)

Krivtsun O. A. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Moscow Iurait Publ. 2014. 549 p. (In Russian)

Chinn P. L. Kramer M. K. Integrated Theory & Knowledge Development in Nursing. Elsevier 2011. 288 p.

Rajendra Kumar Sharma. Sociological Methods and Techniques. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. 1997. 445 p.

Darnell Peter A. Margolis Philip E. C. A Software Engineering Approach. Springer 1996. 498 p.

Radeev A. E O tom chto znachit govorit’ «da» (po Nitsshe i ne tol’ko) [What it means — to say «yes» (according to Nietzsche and not only)]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 17. Philosophy. Conflict studies. Culture studies. Religious studies2015 issue 1 pp. 140–147. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2018-10-07

How to Cite

Радеев, А. Е. (2018). WHAT IS MEANT BY EXPERIENCE WHEN WE CALL IT AESTHETIC?. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(4), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.406

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. PHILOSOPHY. CONFLICT STUDIES. CULTURE STUDIES. RELIGIOUS STUDIES.

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.