PRECEDENT 256

Authors

  • Лариса Павловна Морина St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Евгений Георгиевич Соколов St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.411

Abstract

Th e article was brought to life by a new event in the scientifi c world called by the authors “precedent 256”. Th is attracted the attention of the scientifi c community with its originality. Th e study of the nature and laws of occurrence of this phenomenon in modern culture are in the focus of this article. Th e authors believe that the analyzed precedent does not stand apart from the modern cultural space but is connected by causal relations with the main tendencies of contemporary culture. Moreover, it is a bright representative expression of what is happening in the mental shift s which are taking plce in the modern world. Service, product, competition, advertising, total regimentation of steps-actionsmovements, maximum control, ritualized regulations, the headship of the offi ce to the actual production — all of this, with the transition into a farce, put it in the analyzed precedent. Folding into calculative system of thinking becomes a new form of rationality: the letter becomes an idol, scientometrics, ritual computing achievements, summarizing, creating tables and fi lling in report forms are a sacred mechanism of the formation of the subject. Th e authors assert that, therefore, we are witnessing the birth of a new, virtual-ritualistic reality with unique spacial and temporal parameters. Along with that, a new type of sociality is forming based on impersonal algorithms of actions, typical circuits of behavior. It is a kind of “anthropological intervention0Ф in which the only space where the subject can posit and rehabilitate himself is the element of symbols, letters, fi gures, calculations, and record keeping in the broad sense of the word. Refs 7.

Keywords:

science, ritual, the world of everyday life, regulation, rationality, subject

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Scopus. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopus (дата обращения: 20.03.2016).

Коленько С. Г. Менеджмент в сфере культуры и искусства. М.: Юрайт 2015. 370 с.

Наумова Е. И. Капитализм и культура. Философский взгляд. СПб.: Фонд развития конфлик- тологии 2015. 232 с.

Лукач Д. Овеществление и сознание пролетариата // Лукач Д. История и классовое сознание. Исследования по марксистской диалектике. М.: Логос-Альтера 2003. С. 179–302.

Лосский Н. О. Очерк мистического богословия Восточной Церкви. Догматическое богословие. М.: Центр «СЭИ» 1991. 288 с.

Щютц А. Смысловая структура повседневного мира: очерки по феноменологической социо- логии. М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение» 2003. 336 с.

Зиммель Г. Избранное. Т. 1: Философия культуры. М.: Юрист 1996. 671 с.

References

Scopus. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopus (accessed: 20.03.2016).

Kolen’ko S. G. Menedzhment v sfere kul’tury i iskusstva [Management in the sphere of culture and art]. Moscow Urait Publ. 2015. 370 p. (In Russian)

Naumova E. I. Kapitalizm i kul’tura. Filosofskii vzgliad [Capitalism and culture. Philosophical view] St. Petersburg Th e Fund for the development of confl ictology 2015. 232 p. (In Russian)

Lukach D. Oveshchestvlenie i soznanie proletariat [Reifi cation and the consciousness of the proletariat]. Lukach D. Istoriia i klassovoe soznanie. Issledovaniia po marksistskoi dialektike [Lukacs D. History and class consciousness. Studies in Marxist dialectics]. Moscow Logos-Altera Publ.2003 pp. 179–302. (In Russian)

Losskii N. O. Ocherk misticheskogo bogosloviia Vostochnoi Tserkvi. Dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie [Essay on the mystical theology of the Eastern Church. Dogmatic theology]. Moscow Сenter “SEI” 1991. 288 p. (In Russian)

Shchiutts A. Smyslovaia struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii [Th e Semantic structure of everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology]. Moscow Institute of Fund “Public opinion” Publ. 2003. 336 p. (In Russian)

Zimmel’ G. Izbrannoe. T. 1: Filosofi ia kul’tury [Selected. Vol. 1. Philosophy of culture]. Moscow Urist 1996. 671 p. (In Russian)

Published

2018-10-08

How to Cite

Морина, Л. П., & Соколов, Е. Г. (2018). PRECEDENT 256. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(4), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.411

Most read articles by the same author(s)