An unknown soldier: Philosophical apology of war and its origins

Authors

  • Alexander I. Brodsky St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.402

Abstract

More often than in the case of any other sphere of culture, we face an apology of war while dealing with the history of philosophy. A lot of ancient and modern thinkers praised the phenomenon of war: among them are Heraclitus, Aristotle, Fichte, Hegel, Nietzsche, Vladimir Soloviev, Berdyaev, Sergey Bulgakov, etc. The author of the article attempts to reveal the causes of this phenomenon. In his opinion, some features similar to the mental prerequisites of wars are intrinsic to the very nature of philosophical discourse. Firstly, both philosophy and war share the cult of universal phenomena and the repulsion for everything private and individual. Secondly, both philosophical discourse and military practice employ a kind of “apophatic logic,” when unity is defined through the negation of independence and particularity. Thirdly, both philosophy and war are characterized by anti-utilitarianism, which clashes pragmatic interest against allegiance to the highest non-utilitarian values. These similarities between philosophy and war can be explained by their common function: both should defend the basic concepts of a particular community. Concepts lay the foundations for any religion and tradition, and are usually accepted without further consideration (while always being questioned by other communities). Therefore, war is an inevitable cultural phenomenon. Philosophy arises as a kind of compensation when a tradition is for some reason compromised by the members of the corresponding community. Philosophy exists either as a means of substantiation for a tradition or as a means for replacement. It strives for the revision of the basic set of concepts, but it is impossible to substantiate concepts by means of formal logic. And if a community stops accepting the basic meanings “automatically,” the only means of substantiation is violence (and war is its most radical form). Thus, for philosophy, war is a kind of substitute for argumentation. It is only natural that the majority of adherents to the idea of “eternal peace” ― from Henri de Saint-Simon to Vladimir I. Vernadsky — believed that such a peace is possible only if philosophical thinking will be substituted by scientific thinking (and this is, of course, a utopia).

Keywords:

war, philosophy, ideology, concepts, values, cultural trauma

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Де Местр Ж.Санкт-Петербургские вечера. СПб.: Алетейя, 1998. 731 с.

2. Платон. Государство // Платон.Собр. соч.: в 4 т. / общ. ред. А. Ф. Лосева, В. Ф. Асмуса, А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль, 1994. Т. 3. С. 79–420.

3. Аристотель. Политика // Аристотель. Соч.: в 4 т. / под ред. А. И. Доватура, Ф. Х. Кессиди. М.:Мысль, 1983. Т. 4. С. 375–644.

4. Кант И. К вечному миру // Кант И. Соч.: в 6 т. / под общ. ред. В. Ф. Асмуса, А. В. Гулыги,Т. И. Ойзермана. М.: Мысль, 1966. Т. 6. С. 257–310.

5. Кант И. Идея всеобщей истории во всемирно-гражданском плане // Кант И. Соч.: в 6 т. / под общ. ред. В. Ф. Асмуса, А. В. Гулыги, Т. И. Ойзермана. М.: Мысль, 1966. Т. 6. С. 423–435.

6. Соловьев В. С. Оправдание добра // Соловьев В. С. Соч.: в 2 т. / общ. ред. А. Ф. Лосева, А. В. Гулыги. М.: Мысль, 1988. Т. 1. С. 47–580.

7. Фихте И. Г. Основные черты современной эпохи // Фихте И. Г. Соч. СПб.: Наука, 2008. С. 398–596.

8. Гегель Г. В. Ф. Феноменология духа // Гегель Г. В. Ф. Соч.: в 14 т. М.: Изд-во социально-экономической литературы, 1959. Т. 4. 488 с.

9. Гегель Г. В. Ф. Философия права. М.: Мысль, 1990. 524 с.

10. Ницше Ф. Так говорил Заратустра // Ницше Ф. Полн. собр. соч.: в 13 т. М.: Культурная Революция, 2007. Т. 4. 432 с.

11. Unamuno M. de. Prologue a la traduction francaise // Unamuno M. de. Le sentiment tragique de la vie. Paris: Gallimard, 1979. P. 7–10.

12. Эрн В. Ф. От Канта к Круппу // Эрн В. Ф. Соч. М.: Правда, 1991. С. 308–318.

13. Манн Т. Размышления аполитичного М.: АСТ, 2015. 544 с.

14. Булгаков С. Н. Размышления о войне // Булгаков С. Н. Философия имени. Икона и иконопочитание. М.; СПб.: Искусство, Инапресс, 1999. Т. 2. С. 343–377.

15. Хоркхаймер М., Адорно Т. В. Диалектика просвещения. М.; СПб.: Медиум, Ювента, 1997. 312 с.

16. Cassirer E. The Myth of the State. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1946. 300 p.

17. Платон. Федон // Платон. Собр. соч.: в 4 т. / общ. ред. А. Ф. Лосева, В. Ф. Асмуса, А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль, 1994. Т. 2. С. 7–80.

18. Платон. Теэтет // Платон. Собр. соч.: в 4 т. / общ. ред. А. Ф. Лосева, В. Ф. Асмуса, А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль, 1994. Т. 2. С. 192–274.

19. Аристотель. Метафизика // Аристотель. Соч.: в 4 т. / под ред. А. И. Доватура, Ф. Х. Кессиди. М.:Мысль, 1983. С. 63-450.

20. Бердяев Н. Философия неравенства. М.: ИМА-ПРЕСС, 1990. 285 с.

21. Арендт Х. Истоки тоталитаризма. М.: ЦентрКом, 1996. 670 с.

22. Смирнов И. Человек человеку — философ. СПб.: Алетея, 1999. 370 с.

23. Бродский А. И. Анатомия традиций. Физиологические и семиотические основания вытеснения и актуализации в культуре // Studia Culturae. 2016. № 30. С. 18–29.

24. Бродский А. И. Креативное вытеснение. (К методологии изучения культурных травм) // Философия и культура. 2018. № 8. С. 40–50.

25. Хомский Н, Бервик Р. Человек говорящий. Эволюция и язык. СПб: Питер, 2018. 304 с.

26. Поппер К. Открытое общество и его враги: в 2 т. М.: Международный фонд «Культурная инициатива», 1992. Т. 2. 525 с.

27. Вернадский В. И. Биосфера и ноосфера. М.: Айрис Пресс, 2004. 576 с.

References

1. De Maistre, J. (1998), Les soirees de St-Petersbourg, Aletheia Publ., St. Petersbourg. (In Russian)

2. Plato (1994), “State”, in Plato, Sochineniia, general eds A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus, A. A. Takho-Godi, vol. 3, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 79–420. (In Russian)

3. Aristotle (1983), “Politics”, in Aristotle, Sochineniia, eds A. I. Dovatur, F. Kh. Kessidi, vol. 4, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 375–644. (In Russian)

4. Kant, I. (1966), “Zum ewigen Frieden”, in Kant, I. Sochineniia, general ed. by V. F. Asmus, A. V. Gulyga, T. I. Oizerman, vol. 6, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 257–310. (In Russian)

5. Kant, I. (1966), “Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht”, in Kant, I., Sochineniia, general eds V. F. Asmus, A. V. Gulyga, T. I. Oizerman, vol. 6, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 423–435. (In Russian)

6. Solov’ev, V. S. (1988), “The Truth of Good”, in Solov’ev, V. S., Sochineniia, eds A. F. Losev, A. V. Gulyga, vol. 1, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 47–580. (In Russian)

7. Fichte, J. G. (2008), “Die Hauptmerkmale der Moderne”, in Fichte, J. G., Sochineniia, Nauka Publ., St. Petersbourg, pp. 398–596. (In Russian)

8. Hegel, G. W. F. (1959), “Phänomenologie des Geistes”, in Hegel, G. W. F., Sochineniia, vol. 4, Sotsial’noekonomicheskoi literatury Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

9. Hegel, G. W. F. (1990), Die Rechtsphilosophie, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

10. Nietzsche, F. W. (2007), “Also sprach Zarathustra”, in Nietzsche, F. W., Sochineniia, vol. 4, Kul’turnaia revoliutsiia Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

11. Unamuno, M. de. (1979), “Prologue a la traduction francaise”, in Unamuno, M. de. Le sentiment tragique de la vie, Gallimard, Paris, pp. 7–10. (In French)

12. Ern, V. F. (1991), “From Kant to Krupp”, in Ern, V. F., Sochineniia, Pravda Publ., Moscow, pp. 308–318. (In Russian)

13. Mann, T. (2015), Betrachtungen eines unpolitischen, rus. ed., AST Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

14. Bulgakov, S. N. (1999), “Reflecting about war”, in Bulgakov, S. N., Filosofiia imeni. Ikona i ikonopochitanie, vol. 2, Iskusstvo Publ., Moscow, pp. 343–377. (In Russian)

15. Horkheimer, M. and Adomo, T. W. (1997), Dialektik der Aufklaerung, Medium Publ. and Iuventa Publ., Moscow and St-Petersbourg. (In Russian)

16. Cassirer, E. (1946), The Myth of the State, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

17. Plato (1994), “Fedon”, in Plato, Sochineniia, general eds A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus, A. A. Takho-Godi, vol. 2, Mysl” Publ., Moscow, pp. 7–80. (In Russian)

18. Plato (1994), “Teetat”, in Plato, Sochineniia, general eds A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus, A. A. Takho-Godi, vol. 2, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 192–274. (In Russian)

19. Aristotle (1983), “Metaphysics”, in Aristotle, Sochineniia, eds A. I. Dovatur, F. Kh. Kessidi, vol. 1, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, Russia, pp. 63–450. (In Russian)

20. Berdyaev, N. (1990), The Philosophy of Inequality, IMA-PRESS Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

21. Arendt, H. (1996), The Origins of Totalitarianism, TsentrKom Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

22. Smirnov, I. (1999]), Homo homini philosophus, Aleteiia Publ., St. Petersburg. (In Russian)

23. Brodsky, A. (2016), “Anatomy of tradition”, Studia Culturae, vol. 30, pp. 18–29. (In Russian)

24. Brodsky, A. (2018), “Creative Repression: On the Methodology of Cultural Trauma Studies”, Filosofiia i kul’tura, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 40–50. (In Russian)

25. Berwick, C. R. and Chomsky, N. (2018), Why Only Us. Language and Evolution/em>, rus. ed., Piter Publ., St. Petersburg. (In Russian)

26. Popper, K. R. (1992), The open society and its enemies, rus. ed., vol. 2, Soros Foundation Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

27. Vernadskii, V. I. (2004), Biosphere and noosphere, Airis Press Publ., Moscow. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2020-02-19

How to Cite

Brodsky, A. I. (2020). An unknown soldier: Philosophical apology of war and its origins. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(4), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.402

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.