Mutual recognition: A dialogue between Italian and Russian perspectives

Authors

  • Alberto Pirni Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Institute of Law, Politics and Development, 33, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, Pisa, 56127, Italia
  • Zhanna V. Nikolaeva St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Sofia V. Ignateva St. Petersburg State Academy of Veterinarian Medicine, 41, ul. Kirochnaya, St. Petersburg, 191015, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.112

Abstract

The knowledge and understanding of kaleidoscopic and hypermodern societies rely heavily on the term “recognition.” This term carried a great deal of significance in the Russian philosophical tradition, but attracts less attention now. The main purpose of this paper is to offer a contribution to the discussion on this topic, by considering both the Russian and the European philosophical traditions, with specific reference to the Italian perspective. The methodological focus is concerned with the two essential aspects of recognition: that of the interpersonal and that of the group. Our philosophical analysis of recognition endeavors to take into account first and foremost the problematic field of Otherness. The process of recognition of the Other is thus considered according to three stages of approval: cognitive, moral and social. Cognitive approval includes the identification of the Other as opposite to the group as well as to each individual. The moral stage contemplates concretization of social objectives and accepting the Other as a whole that should above all be respected and accepted. At the stage of social approval, the individual is being recognized within the social context of a group (closed social group) as recognition or rejection. Specifying the recognition leads to a reduction in the number of conflicts, the clarification of borders, and the acceptance of Otherness as an element of individuality. The contribution to the theory of recognition here outlined is new to the Russian scientific context, and may prove challenging in the context of Russian-Italian dialogue. It also constitutes an attempt to compare the common representations of Otherness with current theoretical developments. The theory is illustrated by analysis of closed social groups functioning as a promising series of case studies, in order to open up a renewed interest in research into social reality theories in both Russian and Italian contexts.

Keywords:

recognition, acceptance, Other, identity, closed social groups

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Strelkov, V. I. (2013), Recognition and its Neohegelianist Context, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin, no. 11 (112), pp. 23–38.

2. Devyatinin, P. G. (2007), Ontoantropic principle of “recognition without exception” in N. Fyodorov’s philosophical heritage, Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Science, no. 19 (45), pp. 73–77.

3. Fedorov, N. F. (1995), The question of brotherhood, or kinship, of the reasons for the unbrotherly, unkindred, i.e. hostile, state of the world and of the means to restore kinship (Notes from non-scholars to scholars both spiritual and worldly, to believers and non-believers), in Fedorov, N. F., Semenova, S. G. and Gacheva, A. G. (eds), Sobranie sochinenii, in 4 vols., vol. 1, Progress Publ., Moscow, pp. 35–308. (In Russian)

4. Florensky, P. A. (2000), The analysis of spatiality and time in art and visual works, Progress Publ., Moscow, 328 p. (In Russian)

5. Berdyaev, N. A. (2014), Metaphysics of sex and love, Self-Knowledge: Selected works, BMM Publ., Moscow, 400 p. (In Russian)

6. Ilyin, I. A. (1994), On law consciousness, in Ilyin, I. A., Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 4, Russkaia kniga Publ., Mosсow, 624 p. (In Russian)

7. Melas, V. B. (2015), Phenomenology of Recognition, Logiko-filosofskie studii, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 200–210. (In Russian)

8. Aristotle (1983), The Poetics, transl. by Gasparov, M. L., in Aristotle, Sochineniia, vol. 4, Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, pp. 645–680.(In Russian)

9. Ricoeur, P. (2010), Parcours de la reconnaissance. Trois études, transl. by Blauberg, I. I., Vdovina, I. S., Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia (ROSSPEN) Publ., Moscow, 268 p.(In Russian)

10. Levi-Strauss, K. (1994), La Pensée sauvage, Respublica Publ., Moscow, 384 p. (In Russian)

11. Pirni, A. (2015), La sfida della convivenza. Per un etica interculturale. [The Challenge of Living Together. Towards an Intercultural Ethics], Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 308 p.

12. Simmel, G. (1985), “Bridge and Door”, transl. by Ritter, M., Lotus International, Electa Spa, Milan, vol. 47, pp. 52–56. Rus. Ed.: Simmel, G. (2013), Bridge and Door, transl. by Vahshtajn, V., Sotsiologiia vlasti, vol. 3, pp. 145–150.

13. Pirni, A. (2009), Logiche dell’alterità [Logics of Otherness], Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 232 p.

14. Pirni, A. (2007), Comunità, identità e sfide del riconoscimento [Community, Identity and Challenges of Recognition], Diabasis, Reggio Emilia, 208 p.

15. Henry, B. and Pirni, A., (2006), La via identitaria al multiculturalismo: Charles Taylor e oltre [The Identitarian Path to Multiculturalism: Charles Taylor and Beyond], Rubbettino, Soveria Mannelli, 260 p.

16. Pirni, A. (2005), Filosofia pratica e sfera pubblica. Percorsi a confront [Practical Philosophy and Public Sphere. Comparative Paths], Diabasis, Reggio Emilia, 224 p.

17. Geertz, C. (2000), The Uses of Diversity, In Id. Geertz, C., Available Light. Anthropological Reflection on Philosophical Topics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 288 p.

18. Dunbor, R. I. M. (1997), Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language, Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, 230 p.

19. Merton, R. K. (1968), Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, USA, 702 p.

20. Utekhin, I. (2004), The outline of community sojourn, OGI Publ., Moscow, 274 p. (In Russian)

21. Braun, D. and Kramer, J. (2018), Corporate Tribe: Organization lessons from anthropology, transl. by Okun’kova, I., Alpina Digital Publ., Moscow, 240 p. (In Russian)

22. Ignateva, S. V. (2018), Process of Taboo Transformation by the Example of Nationalism, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/12800 (accessed: 03.02.2019).

23. Simmel, G. (1950), Formalen Soziologie [Sociology], transl. by Wolf, K. H., Collier Macmillan Publishers, London, 447 p.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Pirni, A., Nikolaeva, Z. V., & Ignateva, S. V. (2020). Mutual recognition: A dialogue between Italian and Russian perspectives. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.112

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Cultural studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.