Biology and panpsychism: German evolutionists and a philosopher Theodor Ziehen (1862–1950)

Authors

  • Georgy S. Levit Friedrich-Schiller University
  • Uwe Hossfeld Friedrich-Schiller University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.203

Abstract

Theodor Ziehen was a prominent German psychiatrist and psychologist and a marginal philosopher of the first half of the 20th century who developed an exotic subjective-idealistic theory based on quasi-empirical psychological arguments. Although Ziehen was seen by contemporaries (most prominently by Vladimir Lenin) as a representative of the same philosophical current (empirio-criticism) as Mach and Avenarius, he never achieved their prominence in the history of philosophy. At the same time, Ziehen’s philosophy became influential in German biology, first of all, due to his direct and very strong impact on Bernhard Rensch. Rensch, in his turn, was the most significant figure on the international scene of what is known as the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis in biology. Rensch was not the only biologist influenced by Ziehen’s ideas. Ziehen had some communication with the “German Darwin” Ernst Haeckel and played a prominent role in the concept of the founder of biological systematics Willi Hennig. How to explain Ziehen’s prominent place in the history of evolutionary biology, despite his obscurity in the history of philosophy? Our hypothesis is that Ziehen became a visible figure in evolutionary theory because of the monistic bias in German biology. Ziehen’s epistemology appeared to be compatible with evolutionary monism and was developed by a practicing psychiatrist therefore obtaining a character of a quasi-experimental doctrine.

Keywords:

Theodor Ziehen, Identism, empirio-criticism, Ernst Haeckel, Bernhard Rensch, Willi Henning, psychomonism, monism, Modern Synthesis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Reif, W.-E., Junker, T. and Hossfeld, U. (2000), The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis, Theory in Biosciences, no. 119, pp. 41–91.

2. Kutschera, U. and Niklas, K. J. (2004), The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis, Naturwissenschaften, no. 91, pp. 255–276.

3. Levit, G. S. and Hossfeld, U. (2011), Darwin without borders? Looking at “generalised Darwinism” through the prism of the “hourglass model”, Theory in Biosciences, no. 130, pp. 299–312.

4. Romanes, G. J. (1895), Darwin and After Darwin: Post-Darwinian questions: Heredity and utility, Chicago: Open Court.

5. Bowler, P. J. (1992), The eclipse of Darwinism, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

6. Mayr, E. (1999), Thoughts on the evolutionary synthesis in Germany, in Junker, T. and Engels, E.-M., Die Entstehung der Synthetischen Theorie: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Evolutionsbiologie in Deutschland, Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, pp. 19–29.

7. Hossfeld, U. and Levit, G. S. (2012), Bernhard Rensch — biologischer Universalist im 20. Jahrhundert, in Biologie in unserer Zeit, vol. 4, no. 42, pp. 3–4.

8. Rieppel, O. (2016), Willi Hennig as a Philosopher, in Williams, D., Schmitt, M. and Wheeler, Q. (eds), The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 356–376.

9. Gerhard, U.-J. and Blanz, B. (2004), Theodor Ziehen, American Journal of Psychiatry. vol. 161, no. 8, p. 1369.

10. Ziehen, T. (1923), Beitrag, in Schmidt, R. (ed.), Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen, vol. 4., Leipzig: Meiner Verlag, pp. 219–236.

11. Castell, R. (2003), et al. Geschichte der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie in Deutschland in den Jahren 1937 bis 1961, Göttingen: Vandehoek & Ruprecht Verlag.

12. Seeman, M. V. (2005), Psychiatry in the Nazi Era, Can J Psychiatry, no. 50, pp. 218–225.

13. Ziehen, T. (1915), Die Grundlagen der Psychologie, I. Buch, Erkenntnistheoretische Grundlegung der Psychologie Verlag, Leipzig und Berlin Verlag von B. G. Teubner.

14. Mach, E. (2005), Analysis of Sensations, Moscow: Territoriia budushchego Publ. (In Russian).

15. Blackmore, J., Itagaki, R. and Tanaka, S. (eds) (2001), Ernst Mach’s Vienna 1895–1930 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 218), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

16. Lenin, V. (1972), Materialism and Empirio-criticism: Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy, in Lenin, V., Collected Works, vol. 14, Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 17–362. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/four4.htm (accessed: 21.01.2019).

17. Ziehen, T. (1934), Erkenntnistheorie. Teil I, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

18. Ziehen, T. (1907), Psychophysiologsische Erkenntnistheorie, Jena: Zweite Auflage, Gustav Fischer Publ.

19. Ziehen, T. (1939), Erkenntnistheorie. Teil II, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

20. Rensch, B. (1947), Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution, Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

21. Hopwood, N. (2015), Haeckel’s Embryos: Images, Evolution, and Fraud, London: University of Chicago Press.

22. Rensch, B. (1988), Probleme genereller Determiniertheit allen Geschehens, Berlin and Hamburg: Parey Publ.

23. Rensch, B. (1968), Biophilosophie auf erkenntnistheoretischer Grundlage (Panpsychistischer Identismus), Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

24. Rensch, B. (1971), Biophilosophy, New York: Columbia University Press.

25. Hoßfeld, U. and Olsson, L (2003), The road from Haeckel. The Jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origin of „Evo-Devo“, Biology & Philosophy, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 285–307.

26. Darwin, Ch. (1859), On the Origin of Species, London: John Murray.

27. Haeckel, E. (1866), Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, 2 Bde. I. Bd. Allgemeine Anatomie der Organismen. II. Bd.: Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen, Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer.

28. Haeckel, E. (1868), Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte, Berlin: Georg Weimar Verlag.

29. Ziehen, T. (1919), Haeckel als Philosoph, Die Naturwissenschaften, vol. 7, no. 50. pp. 958–961.

30. Ziehen, T. (1891), Leitfaden der physiologischen Psychologie in 14 Vorlesungen, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

31. Haeckel, E. (1910), Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen: Zweiter Teil, Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann Verlag.

32. Rieppel, O. (2007), The metaphysics of Hennig’s, phylogenetic systematics: substance, events and laws of nature, Systematics and Biodiversity, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 345–360.

33. Rieppel, O. (2006), On concept formation in systematics, Cladistics, no. 22, pp. 474–492.

34. Honderich, T. (ed.) (2005), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, 2 nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

35. Hörz, H., Liebscher, H., Löther, R., Schmutzer, E. and Wollgast, S. (eds.) (1997), Philosophie und Naturwissenschaften, Bonn: Pahl-Rugenstein.

36. Levit, G. S. and Hossfeld, U. (2017), Major Research Traditions in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Biology: The Relations of Germany’s Darwinism with Them, in Delisle, R. (ed.), The Darwinian Tradition in Context, Cham, Springer Nature, pp. 169–193.

37. Hossfeld, U. (2010), Absolute Ernst Haeckel, Freiburg i.B.: Orange Press.

38. Levit, G. S., Simunek, M. and Hossfeld, U. (2008), Psychoontogeny and Psychophylogeny: The Selectionist Turn of Bernhard Rensch (1900–1990) through the Prism of Panpsychistic Identism, Theory in Biosciences, no. 127, pp. 297–322.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Levit, G. S., & Hossfeld, U. (2020). Biology and panpsychism: German evolutionists and a philosopher Theodor Ziehen (1862–1950). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.203

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.