Political identity and national memory: The conflict of contemporary political narratives

Authors

  • Konstantin F. Zavershinskiy St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Alexander I. Koryushkin St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Andrzej Czajowski University of Wrocław, 1, University sq., Wrocław, 50-137, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.107

Abstract

The article examines the place and the role of political narratives of national memory in the processes of political identification of modern political communities. The authors prioritize contemporary socio-cultural research strategies of political phenomena, which interpret political identification processes in the methodological context of the dynamics of national memory’s symbolic structures. The proliferation of such communicative practices as storytelling, political performance, post-factual politics and political imaginary complicates the problem of political identification and its narrative design in modern society and gives rise to multiple nationalist, populist, and ethno-political discourses. In this context, the significance of the theoretical understanding of national codes of communal political identification and an ability to forecast the symbolic contours of a new, more stable narrative of national identity based on codes of solidarity and civic patriotism increases. The study of the impact of symbolic configurations of legitimating profiles of national memory on specifics of everyday political narratives and the discourses of civic patriotism as the semantic core of national identity is particularly important in the study of contemporary political identification. The description of the profiles of the national memory legitimation necessitates a study of the conflict dynamics of the symbolic contours of the national memory, which includes competing semantic components (images of the past, political characteristics of elites, typology of the heroic, priority strategies and practices of fighting “enemies”). In turn, these processes determine the nature of the emergence and multiplication of identity conflicts. Using methodological premises of the cultural and sociological analysis of the dynamics of modern political cultures as symbolic forms of national memory, the authors propose new theoretical approaches to the study of the political identification processes and conflicts among basic political narratives in the realities of contemporary political communicative practices.

Keywords:

political identification, political narratives and political story-telling, national memory, national memory legitimation profiles, patriotic discourses

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Filippov, A. (2015), Mobility and solidarity. The second article, in: Ban’kovskaya, S. (ed.), Sociologia: Nabludeniia, Opyty, Perspektivy, vol. 2, St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, pp. 231–260. (In Russian)

Gill, G. (2011), Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, P. (2005), Why War? The Cultural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Fuksas, V., Gökay B. (2019), The Disintegration of Euro-Atlanticism and New Authoritarianism. Global Power-Shift, Cham: Springer.

Beck, U. (2006), Cosmopolitan Vision, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Krastev, I. (2020), Is It Tomorrow Yet? Paradoxes of the Pandemic, London: Рenguin.

Nadesan, M. (2008), Governmentality, Biopower, and Everyday Life, New York: Routledge.

Eisenstadt, S. and Giesen, B. (1995), The construction of collective identity, European Journal of Sociology, vol. 36 (1), pp. 72–102.

Giesen, B. (2004), Noncontemporaneity, asynchronicity and divided memories, Time & Society, vol. 13 (1), pp. 27–40.

Luhmann, N. (1991), Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, 4. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Poletta, F. and Callahan, J. (2016), Deep stories, nostalgia narratives, and fake news: Storytelling in the Trump era, in: Mast, J. and Alexander, J. (eds), Politics of Meaning/Meaning of Politics: Cultural Sociology of the 2016 US Presidential Election, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 55–71.

Mackert, J. (2019), ‘We the people’: Liberal and organic populism, and the politics of social closure, in: Fitzi, G., Mackert, J. and Turner, B. (eds), Populism and the Crisis of Democracy, vol. 1: Concepts and Theory, New York: Routledge, pp. 91–108.

Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, 1. Bd, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp

Luhmann, N. (2017). Die Realitat der Massenmedien, 5. Aufl, Wiesbaden: Springer.

Luhmann, N. (2006), Differentiation, Moscow: Logos (In Russian)

Alexander, J. (2012), Iconic power and performance: The role of the critic, in: Alexander, J., Bartmański, D. and Giesen, B. (eds), Iconic Power. Materiality and Meaning in Social Life, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25–39.

Bottici, C. (2014), Imaginal Politics: Images Beyond Imagination and the Imaginary, New York: Columbia University Press.

Bottici, C. (2019), Imagination, imaginary, imaginal: Towards a new social ontology?, Social Epistemology, vol. 33 (5), pp. 433–441.

Filippov, A. (2015), Sensuousness and mobilization. To the issue of political esteziology, in: Ban’kovskaya, S. (ed.), Sociologia: Nabludeniia, Opyty, Perspektivy, vol. 2, St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, pp. 134–155. (In Russian)

Filippov, A. (2015), Constructing the past in the process of communication, in: Ban’kovskaya, S. (ed.), Sociologia: Nabludeniia, Opyty, Perspektivy, vol. 2, St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, pp. 7–62. (In Russian)

Alexander, J. (2009), Democratic struggle for power: presidential campaign in the USA of 2008, Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, no. 1 (4), pp. 61–72. (In Russian)

Alexander, J. (2006), Cultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy, in: Alexander, J., Giesen, B. and Mast, J. (eds), Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–89.

Olick, J. (2016), The Sins of the Fathers: Germany, Memory, Method, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Alexander, J. (2012), Trauma: A Social Theory, Malden: Polity Press.

Assmann, A. (2006), Memory, individual and collective, in: Goodin, R. and Tilly, C. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 210–226.

Assmann, A. (2017). The time is out of joint? Rise and fall of the temporal regime of modernity, Rus. ed., transl. by Khlebnikov, B. and Timofeev, D., Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian)

Giesen, B. (2004), Triumph and Trauma, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers

Putin, V. (2016), Meeting with the active members of the Leaders’ Club on February 3, 2016. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51263 (accessed: 25.01.22). (In Russian)

Huddy, L. and Khatib, N. (2007), American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 51 (1), pp. 63–77.

Sable, B., Torres, A. (2018), Patriotism, cosmopolitanism and civic virtue: Trumpians and Trumpism, in: Sable, M. and Torres, A. (eds), Trump and Political Philosophy: Patriotism, Cosmopolitanism, and Civic Virtue, Cham: Springer, pp. 1–22.

Nussbaum, M. (2019), The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Bar-Tal, D. and Staub, E. (eds) (1997), Patriotism in the Life of Individuals and Nations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Bar-Tal, D. (1993), Patriotism as fundamental beliefs of group members, Politics and Individual, vol. 3 (2), pp. 45–61.

Bar-Tal, D. and Telichman, Y. (2005), Stereotypes and Prejudice in Conflict, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Eisenstadt, S. (2002), The continual reconstruction of multiple modem civilizations and collective identities borderlines in a globalized world, in: Preyer, G. and Bös, M. (eds), New Perspectives in Sociology of the World-System, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–12.

Giesen, B. (2013), Ambivalent representations and fragile boundaries: Heroes, victims, perpetrators, in: Salvatore, A., Schmidtke, O. and Trenz, H. (eds), Rethinking the Public Sphere through Transnationalizing Processes in Europe and Beyond, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 75–90.

Filippov, A. (2015), Mobility and Solidarity. Article 1, in: Ban’kovskaya, S. (ed.), Sociologia: Nabludenia, Opiti, Perspektivi, vol. 2, St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, pp. 207–230 (in Russian)

Alexander, J. (2010), The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle forPower, New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16

How to Cite

Zavershinskiy, K. F., Koryushkin, A. I., & Czajowski, A. (2022). Political identity and national memory: The conflict of contemporary political narratives. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.107