Conflict studies of modern terrorism in the context of a risk-reflection approach

Authors

  • Artem N. Sunami St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Kseniya V. Kryukova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.110

Abstract

The article examines the conflict nature of modern terrorism. It is proposed to consider this phenomenon through the prism of a risk-reflective approach. The article demonstrates that modern terrorism is losing its previous ontological features, attachment to a geographical, cultural or political location, and the goals that it manifests acquire an existential character. The current academic discussion around modern terrorism is analyzed and its basic interpretation is given as a means of conflictive action in a political struggle that is characterized by the use of open violence against the civilian population under a certain degree of protection of the opponent and, consequently, the formation of stable social phobias that influence political decision-making. Using original research interpretations of modern terrorism, such as “superterrorism” (E. A. Stepanova), “terrorist situation” (J. Baudrillard), “global war” (M. Hardt, A. Negri), and classic conflict theories expounded by L. Coser, R. Dahrendorf, K. Boulding, L. Kriesberg, the authors conclude that the changed parameters of terrorism lead as well to the transformation of conflict where it is used in a permanent conflict situation. This does not fundamentally imply the quasi-group’s transition into real conflict groups, or into an un-realistic conflict, where terror and the fear generated by it from an instrument of political struggle turns into an end in itself. As it is shown in the article, the ability of social groups to correlate a response to threats with realistic terrorism parameters is significantly reduced. The article raises the issue of the high danger of terrorism risk-reflection transition into the format of social phobia that is spontaneously activated and subsided as a result of the manipulative effect of discursive strategies used by elite groups on it. It is confirmed that the sum of costs generated by the new format of terrorism is becoming a serious factor for modern practices of maintaining the social order in conditions of global competition. 

Keywords:

terrorism, risk, risk-reflection, conflict management, discourse strategy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Бодрийяр Ж. Дух терроризма. Войны в заливе не было. М.: РИПОЛ Классик, 2017. 226 с.

2. Грякалов Н. А. Фигуры террора. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2007. 169 с.

3. Gutorov V., Shirinyants A. Modern terrorism as political and psychological phenomenon: The actual problems of interpretation // Przeglad Strategiczny. 2017. No. 10. P. 277–293.

4. Долин В. А. Терроризм как феномен современного общества: онтологический аспект// Вестник Белгородского юридического института МВД России им. И. Д. Путилина. 2019. № 1. С. 4–8.

5. Baker-Beall C. The evolution of the European Union’s ‘fight against terrorism’ discourse: Constructing the terrorist ‘other’ // Cooperation and Conflict. 2014. Vol. 49(2). P. 212–238.

6. Cунами А. Н. Конфликт ценностей как социально-философское основание борьбы государства с наркорынком // Вестник СПбГУ. Сер. Философия и конфликтология. 2017. Т. 33, вып. 3. С. 381–388.

7. Post J. M. Response, Peace and Conflict // Journal of Peace Psychology. 2002. No. 8. P. 223–227.

8. Tilly Ch. Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists // Sociological Theory. 2004. Vol. 22, is. 1. P. 5–13.

9. Laqueur W. Interpretation of terrorism: Facts, Fiction and Political Science // Journal of Contemporary History. 1977. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 15–17.

10. Степанова Е. А. Терроризм в асимметричном конфликте: идеологические и структурные аспекты. М.: Научная книга, 2010. 288 с.

11. Сунами А. Н. Взаимосвязь наркоторговли и международного терроризма в контексте общественной безопасности // Конфликтология. 2016. Вып. 2. С. 78–88.

12. Miller E. Global Terrorism in 2018 // START, College Park, October 2019. URL: https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/local_attachments/START_GTD_TerrorismIn2018_Oct2018.pdf(дата обращения: 10.10.2019).

13. Стребков А. И., Алейников А. В., Сунами А. Н. Российский молодежный экстремизм: проблемы понимания и противодействия // Криминологический журнал Байкальского государственного университета экономики и права. 2015. Т. 9, № 4. С. 796–806.

14. Finnane M. Terrorism and government: Between history and criminology: Sir John Barry Memorial Lecture // Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2013. Vol. 46 (2). P. 159–177.

15. Qvortrup M. H. Terrorism and Political Science // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2011. Vol. 14 (4). P. 503–517.

16. Sandler T. The analytical study of terrorism: Taking stock // Journal of Peace Research. 2014. Vol. 51(2). P. 257–271.

17. Dahrendorf R. Toward a Theory of Social Conflict // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1958. Vol. 2, no. 2. P. 170–183.

18. Nance M. W. Terrorist Recognition Handbook. New York: Routledge, 2013. 440 p.

19. Wight C. Theorising Terrorism: The State, Structure, and History // International Relations. 2009. Vol. 23, no. 1. P. 99–106.

20. Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 с.

21. Kiper J., Sosis R. Why Terrorism Terrifies Us // Taylor M., Roach J., Pease K. (eds) Evolutionary Psychology and Terrorism. New York: Routledge, 2016. P. 102–123.

22. Хилгартнер C., Боск Ч. Л. Рост и упадок социальных проблем: концепция публичных арен// Социальная реальность. Журнал социологических наблюдений и сообщений. 2008. № 2. С. 73–94.

23. Ibarra, P. R., Kitsuse, J. I. Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources // Miller G., Holstein J. A. (eds) Challenges and choices: constructionist perspectives on social problems. New York: Routledge, 2003. P. 17–50.

24. Cubukcu S., Forst B. Measuring Terrorism // Homicide Studies. 2018. Vol. 22(1). P. 94–116.

25. Hardt M., Negri A. Multitude. War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books, 2005. 448 p.

References

1. Baudrillard, J. (2017), The spirit of terrorism. The gulf war did not take place. RIPOL Klassik Publ., Moscow, 226 p. (In Russian)

2. Gryakalov, N. A. (2007), The figures of terror, St. Petersburg University Press, St. Petersburg, 169 p. (In Russian)

3. Gutorov, V. and Shirinyants, A. (2017), Modern terrorism as political and psychological phenomenon: The actual problems of interpretation, Przeglad Strategiczny, no. 10, pp. 277–293. (In Russian)

4. Dolin, V. A. (2019), Terrorism as phenomenon of contemporary society: ontological aspect, Vestnik Belgorodskogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni I. D. Putilina, no. 1, pp. 4–8. (In Russian)

5. Baker-Beall, C. (2014), The evolution of the European Union’s ‘fight against terrorism’ discourse: Constructing the terrorist ‘other’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 49(2), pp. 212–238.

6. Sunami, A. N. (2017), Conflict of values as a socio-philosophical basis of state’s war on illicit drugmarket. Vestnik SpbGU, Ser. Filosofiia i konfliktologiia, vol. 33, is. 3, pp. 381–388. (In Russian)

7. Post, J. M. (2002), Response, peace and conflict, Journal of Peace Psychology, no. 8, pp. 223–227.

8. Tilly, Ch. (2004), Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists, Sociological Theory, vol. 22, is. 1, pp. 5–13.

9. Laqueur, W. (1977), Interpretation of terrorism: facts, fiction and political science, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 15–17.

10. Stepanova, E. A. (2010), Terrorism in asymmetrical conflict: ideological and structural aspects, Nauchnaia kniga Publ., Moscow, 288 p. (In Russian)

11. Sunami, A. N. (2016), Public safety through the analyses of international terrorism and drug trafficking nexus, Konfliktologiia, is. 2, pp. 78–88. (In Russian)

12. Miller, E. (2019), Global Terrorism in 2018, START, College Park, available at: https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/local_attachments/START_GTD_TerrorismIn2018_Oct2018.pdf(accessed: 10.10.2019).

13. Strebkov, A. I., Aleinikov, A. V. and Sunami, A. N. (2015), Russian youth extremism: problems of understanding and counteraction, Kriminologicheskii zhurnal Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 796–806. (In Russian)

14. Finnane, M. (2013), Terrorism and government: Between history and criminology: Sir John Barry Memorial Lecture, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 46 (2), pp. 159–177.

15. Qvortrup, M. H. (2011), Terrorism and political science, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 14 (4), pp. 503–517.

16. Sandler, T. (2014), The analytical study of terrorism: Taking stock, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 51 (2), pp. 257–271.

17. Dahrendorf, R. (1958), Toward a theory of social conflict, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 170–183.

18. Nance, M. W. (2013), Terrorist Recognition Handbook, Routledge, New York, 440 p.

19. Wight, C. (2009), Theorising Terrorism: The State, Structure, and History, International Relations, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 99–106.

20. Foucault, M. (1996), The will to truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years, Kastal’ Publ., Moscow, 448 p. (In Russian)

21. Kiper, J. and Sosis, R. (2016), Why Terrorism Terrifies Us, Evolutionary Psychology and Terrorism, Taylor, M., Roach, J. and Pease, K. (eds), Routledge, New York, pp. 102–123.

22. Hilgartner, S. and Bosk, C. L. (2008), The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model, Sotsial’naia real’nost’. 0Zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh nabliudenii i soobshchenii, no. 1, pp. 73–94.

23. Ibarra, P. R. and Kitsuse, J. I. (2003), Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources, Challenges and choices: constructionist perspectives on social problems, Miller, G. and Holstein, J. A. (eds), Routledge,New York, pp. 17–50.

24. Cubukcu, S. and Forst, B. (2018), Measuring Terrorism, Homicide Studies, vol. 22(1), pp. 94–116.

25. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2005), Multitude. War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, Penguin Books, London, 448 p.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Sunami, A. N., & Kryukova, K. V. (2020). Conflict studies of modern terrorism in the context of a risk-reflection approach. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.110

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Conflict studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.