The genesis of art and the digital age

Authors

  • Alexander S. Drikker St. Petersburg State University
  • Eugene A. Makovetsky St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.310

Abstract

The complete translation of cultural heritage into a digital format acutely poses the question of art’s place in the digital era. The search for an answer is built upon the foundation of proposed evolutionary models of the genesis of art. Transitional periods from one historical cultural era to the next are characterized by a change in the most popular types of art. The establishment of one or another type of art is rigidly connected with the introduction of new data storage media and coding techniques. The constant increase in the variety of genres and media has culminated in the digital display. The appearance of a universal digital media must be reflected in the energetic reconstruction of the artistic world, but the birth of new types of art will lag behind. Moreover, the problem of the existence or non-existence of art also becomes relevant. In parallel with the elimination of literature, a virtual excarnation of object plasticity is occurring. It is possible that art is irreversibly forsaking sensual and bodily language, but the idea that it is using such an unexpected lexicon in an attempt to break through to the individual directly seems more productive. The purpose of art is to expand the space of consciousness. The digital age is distinguished by its possibility to transform this space in surprising ways. Digitalization of a work has a clear basic similarity to the physiological process of convolution of a sensory signal in the depths of the brain. Computer-based dipoles and neural synapses are binary structures, described in binary symbols. A work that has been translated into digits can be seen as the projection of a certain neural configuration that has come together in the depths of consciousness and is revealed in the form of an image. The likely prospects of obtaining, instead of projections, a multi-dimensional digital display, as well as the potential possibility for the psyche to adequately decipher it, portend a holistic reading of the work and even closer contact between the artist and the addressee. Right on the horizon is the path towards a synthesis of images that go beyond the limits of the usual forms and sensations. And nowadays unimaginable classes of feelings are capable of generating many vibrant “types and genres”. At the same time, threatening to the habitual methods of sensory perception and facilitating the liberation of the spirit, the excarnation of art works promise a categorically new stage in the genesis of art as well as a different level of creation and perception. 

Keywords:

evolution, types of art, data storage media, digital code, excarnation, virtuality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Шпенглер, О. (1993), Закат Европы, М.: Искусство.

2. Тэн, И. (1996), Философия искусства, М.: Республика.

3. Дриккер, А. С. (2000), Эволюция культуры: информационный подход, СПб.: Академический проект.

4. Платон (1993), Федр, в Платон, Собрание сочинений, в 4 т., т. 2, под ред. Лосева, А. Ф. и Асмуса, В. Ф., Тахо-Годи, А. А., М.: Мысль.

5. Тойнби, А. (2010), Постижение истории. Избранное, М.: Айрис-Пресс.

6. Вирильо, П. (2004), Машина зрения, СПб.: Наука.

7. Шиллер, Ф. (1957), Письма об эстетическом воспитании человека, в Шиллер, Ф., Собрание сочинений, в 7 т., т. 6, М.: Художественная литература, с. 251–358.

8. Бердяев, Н. А. (2004), Судьба России. Кризис искусства, М.: КАНОН+, ОИ «Реабилитация».

9. Buden, B. (2009), Art after the end of society, Maska, no. 121–122, pp. 24–37.

10. Вейдле, В. (1996), Умирание искусства: Размышления о судьбе литературного и художественного творчества, СПб.: Axiōma.

11. Danto, А. (1996), After the End of Art, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

12. Kosuth, J. (1991), Art after Philosophy and After, in Kosuth, J., Collected Writings 1966–1990, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pр. 13–32.

13. Дриккер, А. С. и Маковецкий, Е. А. (2017), Язык числа, Человек, № 4, с. 173–181.

14. Маклюэн, М. (2003), Понимание медиа: внешние расширения человека, М.; Жуковский: КАНОН-пресс-Ц, Кучково поле.

15. Greenberg, C. (2003), Late Writings, ed. by Morgan, R. C., St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.

16. Малевич, К. С. (б. г.), От кубизма к супрематизму, Пг.: Отдел изобразительных искусств Наркомпроса.

17. Кандинский, В. (2004), Точка и линия на плоскости, СПб.: Азбука-классика.

18. Станиславский, К. С. (1957), Работа актера над ролью, в Станиславский, К. С., Собрание сочинений, в 8 т., т. 4, М.: Искусство.

19. Поршнев, Б. Ф. (2007), О начале истории, СПб.: Алетейя.

20. Крамер, С. (1965), История начинается в Шумере, М.: Наука.

21. Сальникова, Е. В. (2012), Феномен визуального. От древних истоков к началу XXI века, М.: Прогресс-Традиция.

22. Лем, С. (2012), Сумма технологий, М.: АСТ.

23. Яковлева, Л. Ю. (2018), Медиаэстетика дигитальности, Критика цифрового разума, под ред. Савчука, В. В., СПб.: Центр медиафилософии Института философии СПбГУ.

24. Whitehead, A. N. (1929), Process and Reality, Cambridge: Macmillan Co.

25. Parisi, L. and Potanova, S. (2012), Soft thought (in architecture and choreography), Computational Culture. A Journal of Software Studies, no. 1. URL: http://computationalculture.net/soft-thought/ (дата обращения: 11.07.2020).

References

1. Spengler, O. (1993), The Decline of the West, transl. by Svasyan, K., Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)

2. Taine, H. (1996), The Philosophy of Art, transl. by Chudinov, A., Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)

3. Drikker, A. (2000), Evolution of culture: information approach, St. Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

4. Plato (2002), Phaedrus, transl. by Egunov, A., Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

5. Toynbee, A. (2010), A Study of History, transl. by Zarkov, E., Moscow: Airis-Press Publ. (In Russian)

6. Virilio, P. (2004), The Vision Machine, transl. by Shestakov, A. V., St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

7. Schiller, F. (1957), On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, transl. by Radlov, E., Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

8. Berdyaev, N. (2004), Fate of Russia. Art crisis, Moscow: KANON+, OI «Reabilitatsiia» Publ. (In Russian)

9. Buden, B. (2009), Art after the end of society, Maska, no. 121–122, pp. 24–37. (In Russian)

10. Veydle, V. (1996), Art Dying: Reflections about the Fate of Literary and Art Creativity, St. Petersburg: Axiōma Publ. (In Russian)

11. Danto, А. (1996), After the End of Art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12. Kosuth, J. (1991), Art after Philosophy and After, in Kosuth, J. Collected Writings 1966–1990, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pр. 13–32.

13. Drikker, A. and Makovetsky, E. (2017), Language of Number, Chelovek, no. 4, pp. 173–181.

14. McLuhan, M. (2003), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, transl. by Nikolaev, V., Moscow, Zhukovskii: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russian)

15. Greenberg C. (2003), Late Writings, ed. by Morgan, R. C., St. Paul, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

16. Malevich, K. (without year), From cubism to suprematism, Petrograd: Otdel izobrazitel’nykh iskusstv Narkomprosa Publ. (In Russian)

17. Kandinskiy, V. (2004), A point and a line on plane, St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika Publ. (In Russian)

18. Stanislavskiy, K. (1957), Work of an actor on role, in Stanislavskiy, K., Collected works, in 8 vols., vol. 4, Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)

19. Porshnev, B. (2007), About the beginning of human history, St. Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

20. Kramer, S. (1965), History Begins at Sumer, transl. by Mendelson, F., Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

21. Salnikova, E. (2012), Phenomenon of visual. From ancient sources by the beginning of the 21 st century, Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

22. Lem, S. (2012), Summa Technologiae, transl. by Gromov, A. and others, Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian)

23. Yakovleva, L. (2018), Digitalnost of madiaesthetics, in Savchuk, V. V. (ed.), Critique of the digital mind, St. Petersburg: Tsentr mediafilosofii Instituta filosofii SPbGU Publ. (In Russian)

24. Whitehead A. (1929), Process and Reality, Cambridge, Mass.: Macmillan Co.

25. Parisi, L. and Potanova, S. (2012), Soft thought (in architecture and choreography), Computational Culture. A Journal of Software Studies, no. 1. Available at: http://computationalculture.net/soft-thought/ (accessed: 11.07.2020).

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Drikker, A. S., & Makovetsky, E. A. (2020). The genesis of art and the digital age. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(3), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.310