Risk-reflections’ Conflict Potential: Conceptual Models and Research Problems of the Modern Analytics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.309Abstract
Correlation problem of contradictions between “risk-beneficiaries” and “risk-outsiders” gains particular relevance during periods of the established order’s forced change and fundamental, ontological uncertainty. On the basis of riskological literature generalization we offer conflict potential’s analysis methodology of different risk-reflections’ types. Theoretical developments on problems of risk and protection/security forms’ dialectic and dialectic of risk’s foundation and its reflection had served as research’s conceptual framework. In this debate special place is occupied by works by U.Beck whose interpretation of actualization of social tensions is linked with the conflictual perception of risks’ producers and consumers and works by P.Virno who suggested certain theoretical solutions on methodology of risks-reflexivity’s key elements’ singling out. Authors’ attention is focused on the main reflexive characteristics of stakeholders’ analysis. It is shown that risk-reflections are fraught with ideological and political preferences while in risks’ distribution process there is difference of hierarchies in which under certain stakeholders’ dominance, risk-beneficiaries shape outsiders’ adaptation strategies to their advantage in zone of threats and dangers, imposing them certain risk-reflections models, winning chances’ institualization forms and risk behavior strategies. Article considers approaches to the solution of the issue of the different interests’ groups’ selection criteria of the dangers’ priorities’ importance and significance and evaluation/revaluation/underestimation issue of risk severity levels and its social acceptability. Article presents theoretical perspective of the socially acceptable risk level, its capacity, limit and disagreement of social subjects with the evaluation of tolerance towards risk on the basis of “risk-appetite” model. In this context special attention is paid to the threats’ free “selling and buying” logic, e.g. security as the source of risk management resources’ conversion into possession of power and property. Authors come to the conclusion that risks exploitation and earning rent from risks management along with reflexive conservation of risks’ distribution system cause society’s conflict potential’s growth.
Keywords:
risk, risk-reflection, conflict, uncertainty, risk-stakeholders, risk-beneficiary, risk- outsiders
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Дуглас, М. (1994), Риск как судебный механизм, THESIS, вып. 5, с. 242–276.
Гегель, Г. (1978), Политические произведения, М.: Наука.
Cascio, J. Facing the Age of Chaos. URL: https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Компания КРОС, Спецпроект в рамках исследования «Национальный индекс тревожностей». URL: https://www.cros.ru/ru/exploration/research/1231/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Индекс страхов, Всероссийский центр изучения общественного мнения. URL: wciom.ru/ratings/indeks-strakhov (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Иерархия массовых страхов жителей РФ, Левада-центр*. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2022/01/12/strahi-5/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Нестик, Т.А. и Задорин, И.В. (2020), Отношение россиян к глобальным рискам: социально-демографические и психологические факторы восприятия угроз, Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, No 5, с. 4–28.
Бек, У. (2000), Общество риска: на пути к другому модерну, М.: Прогресс-Традиция.
Schmidt, V.A. (2008), Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse, Annual review of political science, no. 4, pp. 303–326.
Селигмен, А. (2002), Проблема доверия, М.: Идея-Пресс, 2002.
Грякалов, А.А. (2014), Неопределенность: событие и рефлексия, Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 17. Философия. Конфликтология. Культурология. Религиоведение, вып. 2, с. 12–21.
Зубок, Ю.А. и Чупров, В.И. (2008), Социальная регуляция в условиях неопределенности. Теоретические и прикладные проблемы в исследовании молодежи, Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, No 2, с. 142–155.
Норт, Д. (2010), Понимание процесса экономических изменений, М.: Издательский дом ГУВШЭ.
Нестик, Т.А. и Журавлев, А.Л.(ред.) (2020), Человек в условиях глобальных рисков: социально- психологический анализ, М.: Институт психологии РАН.
McCombs, M. and Shaw, D. (1972), The agenda-setting function of mass-media, Public opinion quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 176–187.
Соловьев, А.И. (2019), Политическая повестка правительства, или зачем государству общество, Полис. Политические исследования, No 4, с. 8–25.
Характер и структура массовой тревожности в России, Левада-центр*. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2021/04/21/harakter-i-struktura-massovoj-trevozhnosti-v-rossii/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Вирно, П. (2013), Грамматика множества: к анализу форм современной жизни, М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс.
Алле, М. (1994), Поведение рационального человека в условиях риска, THESIS, вып. 5, с. 217–241.
Гидденс, Э. (1994), Судьба, риск и безопасность, THESIS, вып. 5, с. 105–134.
Тихонова, Н.Е. (2018), Стратификация по жизненным шансам массовых слоев современного российского общества, Социологические исследования, No 6, с. 53–65.
Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman.
Mendelow, A. (1991), Environmental Scanning: The Impact of the Stakeholder Concept, Proceedings From the Second International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 407–418.
Луман, Н. (2013), Риск и опасность, Отечественные записки, No 2. URL: https://strana-oz.ru/2013/2/risk-i-opasnost/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Полтерович, В.М. (2021), Коллаборативные иерархии, Вопросы экономики, No 7, с. 31–48.
Недяк, И.Л., Павлова, Т.В., Патрушев С.В. и Филиппова Л.Е. (2020), Политическое поле и зона власти: версии идеального типа и опыт эмпирической верификации, Социологические исследования, No 1, с. 42–53.
Яницкий, О.Н. (2002), «Критический случай»: социальный порядок в «обществе риска», Социологическое обозрение, т. 2, No 2, с. 86–99.
Диев, В.С. (2019), Неопределенность, риск и принятие решений в междисциплинарном контексте, Сибирский философский журнал, No 4, с. 41–52.
Качалов, Р.М. (2020), Феномен риска как искусственный объект экономических исследований, Проблемы анализа риска, No 1, с. 100–108.
Мадера, А.Г. (2014), Риски и шансы. Неопределенность, прогнозирование и оценка, М.: URSS.
Магницкий, Н.А. (2011), Теория динамического хаоса, М.: Ленанд.
Hilgartner, S. and Bosk, Ch. L. (1988), The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model, American journal of sociology, 1988, no. 1, pp. 53–78.
Дьякова, Е.Г. (2002), Массовая коммуникация и власть в теории установления повестки дня, Научный ежегодник Института философии и права Уральского отделения Российской академии наук, вып. 3, с. 144–168.
Латов, Ю.В. (2004), Власть-собственность в средневековой России, Экономический вестник Ростовского государственного университета, No 4, с. 111–133.
Плискевич, Н.М. (2006), «Власть-собственность» в современной России: происхождение и перспективы мутации, Мир России, No 3, с. 62–113.
Цирель, С.В. (2006), «Власть-собственность» в трудах российских историков и экономистов, Общественные науки и современность, No 3, с. 119–131.
Васильев, Л.С. (2013), История Востока: в 2 т., т. 1, М.: Юрайт.
Берч, К. (2015), Риск-аппетит: не откусывайте больше, чем можете проглотить. URL: https://www.cfin.ru/fi nanalysis/risk/RiskAppetite.shtml (дата обращения: 15.03.2023).
Tierney, K.J. (1994), Sociology’s unique contribution to the study of risk, Paper presented at the 13th World congress of sociology, Bielefeld, July, pp. 2–22.
Бек, У. (1994), От индустриального общества к обществу риска, THESIS, вып. 5, с. 161–168.
Яницкий, О.Н. (2011). Риск солидарности в критической ситуации, Социологический ежегодник, сборник научных трудов, М.: ИНИОН, НИУ-ВШЭ.
Павловский, Г.О. и Гаазе, К.Б. (2020), Маркс и теория события Михаила Гефтера, Философия. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, No 2, с. 165–202.
Beck, U. (2006), Living in the World Risk Society, Economy and Society, no. 3, pp. 29–345.
Aleinikov, A.V., Gazimagomedov, G.G., Maltseva, D.A., Miletskiy, V.P. and Safonova, O.D. (2021), Risk reflexity and information interpretation conflict under the conditions of coronacrisis, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, no. 4, pp. 258–264.
Archer, M. S. (2003), Structure, agency and the internal conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge Uniersity Press.
Кучинов, А.М. (2017), Теория социального морфогенеза и рефлексивности Маргарет Арчер (Сводный реферат), Метод: Московский ежегодник трудов из обществоведческих дисциплин, вып. 7, с. 365–392.
Норт, Д., Уоллис, Д., и Вайнгаст, Б. (2011), Насилие и социальные порядки. Концептуальные рамки для интерпретации письменной истории человечества, М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.
Алейников, А.В. и Сунами, А.Н. (2022), Факторы конструирования риск-рефлексий: конфликтные грани размежеваний, Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, т. 38, вып. 3, с. 382–396.
Тамбовцев, В. (2015), Миф о «культурном коде» в экономических исследованиях, Вопросы экономики, No 12, с. 85–106.
Arndt, J., Routledge, C., Cox, C.R. and Goldenberg, J.L. (2005), The worm at the core: A terror management perspective on the roots of psychological dysfunction, Applied and Preventive Psychology, no. 11, pp. 191–213.
Mythen, G. (2018), Thinking with Ulrich Beck: security, terrorism and transformation, Journal of risk research, no. 1, pp. 17–28.
Фишман, Л.Г., Мартьянов, В.С. и Давыдов, Д.А. (2019), Рентное общество: в тени труда, капитала и демократии, М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики.
* «Левада-центр» признан иностранным агентом в РФ.
References
Douglas, M. (1994), Risk as Forensic Resource, THESIS, is. 5, pp. 242–276. (In Russian)
Hegel, G. (1978). Political works, Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
Cascio, J. Facing the Age of Chaos. Available at: https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d (accessed: 15.03.2023).
CROS, Special project within the framework of the study “National Anxiety Index”. Available at: https://www.cros.ru/ru/exploration/research/1231 (accessed: 15.03.2023). (In Russian)
Russian Public Opinion Research Center, Fear Index. Available at: wciom.ru/ratings/indeks- strakhov (accessed: 15.03.2023). (In Russian)
Hierarchy of mass fears of Russians, Levada Center*. Available at: https://www.levada.ru/2022/01/12/strahi-5/ (accessed: 15.03.2023). (In Russian)
Nestik, T.A. and Zadorin, I.V. (2020), Russians’ Attitudes towards Global Risks: Socio-Demographic and Psychological Factors Affecting People’s Perception of Threats, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 5, pp. 4–28. (In Russian)
Beck, U. (2000), Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, Moscow: Progress-traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)
Schmidt, V.A. (2008), Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse, Annual review of political science, no. 4, pp. 303–326.
Seligman, A. (2002), The problem of confidence, Moscow: Ideia-Press Publ. (In Russian)
Gryakalov, A.A. (2014), Uncertainty: event and reflection, Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University, Series 17: Philosophy. Conflict studies. Culture studies. Religious studies, is. 2, pp. 12–21. (In Russian)
Zubok, Yu.A. and Chuprov, V.I. (2008), Social regulation in conditions of uncertainty. Theoretical and applied problems in the study of youth, Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes, no. 2, pp. 142–155. (In Russian)
North, D. (2010), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Moscow: HSE Press. (In Russian)
Nestik, T.A. and Zhuravlev, A.L. (eds) (2020), An Individual in the Context of Global Risks: A Socio- Psychological Analysis, Moscow: Institut Psikhologii RAS Publ. (In Russian)
McCombs, M. and Shaw, D. (1972), The agenda-setting function of mass-media, Public opinion quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 176–187.
Solovyov, A.I. (2019), Political Agenda of the Government, or Why the State Needs the Society, Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 8–25. (In Russian)
The nature and structure of mass anxiety in Russia, Levada Center*. Available at: https://www.levada.ru/2021/04/21/harakter-i-struktura-massovoj-trevozhnosti-v-rossii/ (accessed: 15.03.2023). (In Russian)
Virno, P. (2013), A Grammar of the Multitude. For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life, Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian)
Alle, M. (1994), Rational Human Behaviour under Conditions of Risk, THESIS, is. 5, pp. 217–241. (In Russian)
Giddens, A. (1994), Fate, Risk and Security, THESIS, is. 5, pp. 105–134. (In Russian)
Tikhоnova, N.E. (2018), Stratification by life chances of mass strata in modern russian society, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], no. 6, pp. 53–65. (In Russian)
Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman.
Mendelow, A. (1991), Environmental Scanning: The Impact of the Stakeholder Concept, in: Proceedings From the Second International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, pp. 407–418.
Luhman, N. (2013), Risk and danger, Otechestvennye zapiski, 2013, no. 2. Available at: https://stranaoz.ru/2013/2/risk-i-opasnost (accessed: 15.03.2023). (In Russian)
Polterovich, V.M. (2021), Collaborative hierarchies, Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 7, pp. 1–48. (In Russian)
Nedyak, I.L., Pavlova, T.V., Patrushev, S.V. and Philippova, L.E. (2020), Political field and zone of power: ideal type varieties, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], no. 1, pp. 42–53. (In Russian)
Yanitskiy, О.N. (2002), The “critical case”: Social order in the “Risk society”, Russian Sociological Review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 86–99. (In Russian)
Diev, V. S. (2019), Uncertainty, Risk and Decision-Making in an Interdisciplinary Context, Siberian Journal of Philosophy, no. 4, pp. 41–52. (In Russian)
Kachalov, R.M. (20200, Risk phenomenon as an artificial economic science object, Issues of Risk Analysis, no. 1, pp. 100–108. (In Russian)
Madera, A.G. (2014), Risks and Odds. Uncertainty, forecasting and assessment, Moscow: URSS Publ. (In Russian)
Magnitskii, N.A. (2011), Theory of dynamical chaos, Moscow: Lenand Publ. (In Russian)
Hilgartner, S. and Bosk, Ch. L. (1988), The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model, American journal of sociology, 1988, no. 1, pp. 53–78.
D’yakova, E. G. (2002), Mass Communication and Power in Agenda-Setting Theory, Nauch. ezhegodnik In-ta filosofii i prava Ural. otd-niia Ros. akad. nauk, is. 3, pp. 144–168. (In Russian)
Latov, Yu.V. (2004), Power-property in medieval Russia, Ekonomicheskii vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet, no. 4, pp. 111–133. (In Russian)
Pliskevich, N.M. (2006), «Power — property» in modern Russia: the origin and perspectives of mutation, Mir Rossii, no. 3, pp. 62–113. (In Russian)
Tsirel, S.V. (2006), «Power-property» in the works of Russian historians and economists, Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 3, pp. 119–131. (In Russian)
Vasiliev, L. S. (2013), History of the East, vol. 1. Moscow: Iurait Publ. (In Russian)
Birch, K. (2015), Risk appetite: Don’t bite off more than you can swallow. Available at: https://www.cfin.ru/fi nanalysis/risk/Risk_Appetite.shtml (accessed 15.03.2023) (In Russian)
Tierney, K.J. (1994), Sociology’s unique contribution to the study of risk: Paper presented at the 13th World congress of sociology, Bielefeld, July, pp. 2–22.
Beck, U. (1994), From Industrual Society to the Risk Society, THESIS, is. 5, pp. 161–168 (In Russian)
Yanitskii, O.N. (2011), The Risk of Solidarity in a Critical Situation, Sotsiologicheskii ezhegodnik [Sociological Yearbook], pp. 143–161, Moscow: INION, HSE Publ. (In Russian)
Pavlovskiy, G.O., and Gaaze, K.B. (2020), Marx and Michael Gefter’s Theory of the Event, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 2, pp. 165–202. (In Russian)
Beck, U. (2006), Living in the World Risk Society, Economy and Society, no. 3, pp. 29–345.
Aleinikov, A.V., Gazimagomedov, G.G., Maltseva, D.A., Miletskiy, V.P. and Safonova, O.D. (2021), Risk reflexity and information interpretation conflict under the conditions of coronacrisis, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, no. 4, pp. 258–264.
Archer, M. S. (2003), Structure, agency and the internal conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuchinov, A.M., (2017), Margaret Archer’s theory of social morphogenesis and reflectivity, Metod, no. 7, pp. 365–392. (In Russian)
North, D., Wallis, J. and Weingast, B. (2011), Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history, Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara Publ. (In Russian)
Aleinikov, A.V. and Sunami, A.N. (2022), Risk-reflections design factors: Conflict lines of cleavages, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 38, is. 3, pp. 382–396. (In Russian)
Tambovtsev, V. (2015), The myth of the “cultural code” in economic research, Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 12, pp. 85–106. (In Russian)
Arndt, J., Routledge, C., Cox, C.R. and Goldenberg, J.L. (2005), The worm at the core: A terror management perspective on the roots of psychological dysfunction, Applied and Preventive Psychology, no. 11, pp. 191–213.
Mythen, G. (2018), Thinking with Ulrich Beck: security, terrorism and transformation, Journal of risk research, no. 1, pp. 17–28.
Fishman, L.G., Martyanov, V. S. and Davydov, D.A. (2019), Rent Society: In the Shadow of Labor, Capital and Democracy, Moscow: HSE Press. (In Russian)
* Levada Center is recognized as a foreign agent in Russian Federation.
Downloads
Published
2023-09-28
How to Cite
Aleinikov, A. V., Strebkov, A. I. ., & Miletskiy, V. P. (2023). Risk-reflections’ Conflict Potential: Conceptual Models and Research Problems of the Modern Analytics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(3), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.309
Issue
Section
Conflict studies
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
