ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY: COMPELLED REFLECTION

Authors

  • Анатолий Сергеевич Колесников St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.204

Abstract

The article deals with the history of analytic philosophy which involved periods when the importance of metaphysics was rejected, along with speculative philosophy and an accent was placed on the analysis of the language. The analytical tradition always presumed western philosophy as something self-evident. Until recently disputes on the importance of history of philosophy for analysts had not arisen. It not especially favored. However, the possibility of losing the self-reflection of analytic philosophy, the prob-ability of losing the analysis of one’s own foundation in the mirror of other traditions, having some-what other grounds than analytics, brought special attention to the history of philosophy. Compelled reflection revealed not only its attitude towards continental philosophy, but also threw light both on its success and its shortcomings. The strengthened work on an origin of analytical philosophy for the purpose of replacement of the developed myth with historical truth has begun. Now there are disputes concerning the term of interpretation «analytical philosophy» and the thinkers it involves. A problem is that is difficult to make exact definition of “analytical philosophy” as it is not so much a specific doc-trine as a liberal range of approaches to problems. The problem was to find a method of classification of analytical philosophers or to sort out their relations to the thought movement which history makes analytical tradition. Gradually for analysts it became clear that programs of analytical philosophy have replaced each other because the latent metaphysical assumptions lying in their basis have changed. The history of the historical-philosophical discussion of a problem is offered also by the given paper. Refs 31.

Keywords:

analytic philosophy, logicism, the analysis of the language, Frege, Russell, linguistic turning, Wittgenstein, Quine, Dummett, Hacker, Rorty

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература / References

The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes. Eds A. Biletski A. Matar. London Routledge Publ. 1998. 276 p.

A Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Eds A. P. Martinich David Sosa. Oxford Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2001. 510 p.

Sellars W. Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. London 1967. 238 p.

Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Eds Monk Ray Palmer Anthony. Bristol Thoemmes Press Publ. 1996. 400 p.

Dummett M. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Duckworth 1993. VII+182 p.

Hurka T. Moore in the Middle. Ethics2003 no. 113 pp. 599–630.

Follesdal Dagfinn. Analytic Philosophy: What is it and why should one engage in it? Ed. by H. J. Glock. The Rise of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford Blackwell Publ.1997 pp. 1–16.

Wheeler S. Deconstruction as Analytic Philosophy. Stanford CA Stanford University Press Publ. 2000. 312 p.

A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Ed. by C. G. Prado. Humanity Books Publ. 2003. 329 p.

Hacker P. M. S. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford Blackwell Publ. 1996. 368 p.

Sluga H. What Has History to Do with Me? Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy. Inquiry1998 vol. 41 no. 1 pp. 119–121.

Sluga H. Frege on Meaning. Ed. by H. J. Glock. The Rise of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford Blackwell Publ.1997 pp. 17–34.

Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege Russell Wittgenstein. Ed. by W. W. Tait. Chicago Open Court Publ. 1997. 300 p.

Gottfried G. Frege Lotze and the Continental roots of Early Analytic Philosophy. E. by E. Reck E. From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford Oxford University Press Publ.2002 pp. 39–51.

Hacker P. M. S. The Rise of Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Ed. by H. J. Glock. The Rise of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford Blackwell Publ. 1997. pp. 51–76.

Milkov N. What is analytic philosophy? Avialaible at: http://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/kw/institute/Philosophie/Personal/Milkov/analytic2.pdf (accessed 22.11.2016).

Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy vol 22. Berlin New York de Gruyter 1999. xii+162 p.

Frege: Importance and Legacy. Ed. by M. Schirn. Berlin De Gruyter Publ. 1996. VI+466 p.

Soames S. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Princeton Princeton University Press Publ. 2003. 432 p.

Rorty R. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press 1982. xlvii+237 p.

Continental Philosophy in the 20th Century vol. VIII. Ed. by R. Kearney. London New York Routledge 1994. 524 p.

Classics of analytical metaphysics. Ed. by Blackman Larry Lee. Lanham University Press of America Publ. 1984. v+287 p.

Rorty R. The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. Philosophy in History. Eds by R. Rorty J. B. Schneewind Q. Skinner. Cambridge1984 pp. 49–75.

Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy. Eds T. Sorell G. A. J. Rogers. New York Oxford University Press 2005. 240 p.

Strawson P. F. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason. London Methuen 1966. 296 p.

The Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy: Contemporary Engagement between Analytic and Continental Thought. Eds W. Egginton M. Sandbothe. Albany State University of New York Press Publ. 2004. 262 p.

McDowell J. Mind and world. Cambridge MA Harvard University Press Publ. 1994. 224 p.

Brandom R. B. Making it explicit: Reasoning representing and discursive commitments. Cambridge MA Harvard University Press Publ. 1994. 741 p.

Redding P. Analytic Philosophy and the return of Hegelian thought. Cambridge University Press Publ. 2007. 264 p.

Cohen L.G. The dialogue оf Reason: Аn analysis оf Analytical Philosophy. Oxford Clarendon Press 1986. X+237 p.

Stroll A. Today and Tomorrow. Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Columbia University Press Publ. New York2000 pp. 246–270.

Published

2018-09-28

How to Cite

Колесников, А. С. (2018). ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY: COMPELLED REFLECTION. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 33(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.204