The phenomenon of the Soviet conservatism: historiosophical justification

Authors

  • Владимир Михайлович Камнев St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Лолита Сергеевна Камнева St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.104

Abstract

In the article Mikh. Lifshitz’s project of “great restoration” (Restauratio Magna) is considered in the horizon of more general process covering in the Soviet Russia of the 1930th all spheres of public life from economy to philosophy and art. The total understanding of this global process of restoration of classical ideals and traditional norms was formed in the 30th years only by Mikh. Lifshitz and in a circle of his supporters. Considered the phenomenon of the Soviet conservatism is also born in this process of restoration. Studying this phenomenon,
its estimation is important for the humanities because it allows getting rid of unilateral approaches. In the article similarities and distinctions of pre-revolutionary and Soviet forms of conservative outlook are disclosed. The originality of the Soviet conservatism is that it is longtime quite peacefully coexists with the Marxist ideas which are very far from the traditional idea of conservatism. At the same time, this coexistence of conservative values and the Marxist ideas predetermines opposition to pre-revolutionary conservatism because the idea of a return to last Russia is unacceptable. The first signs of the beginning of the formation of the Soviet conservatism are returned to traditional norms of family life in state policy and gradual, but the irrevocable refusal of different experiments in education and upbringing. In the political sphere, the Soviet conservatism had an effect on a great-power foreign policy, on the dissolution of the Komintern aimed at the realization of the world revolution, in the restoration of an institute of the patriarchate and on some other steps. The phenomenon of the Soviet conservatism played an important role in mobilization policy of the state both during the world war and after it.

Keywords:

conservatism, Marxism, ideology, dogmatism, liberalism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Арсланов В. Г. К читателю этой книги // Лифшиц М. А. Что такое классика? М.: Искусство — XXI век, 2004. С. 7–30.

Вишневский А. Г. Серп и рубль: консервативная модернизация в СССР. М.: ОГИ, 1998. 432 с.

Надточий Э. В. Тимур и его arcane: социально-антропологическое значение советской революции «детства» в 1920–30-е годы // Социология власти. 2014. № 3. С. 81–98.

Лифшиц М. А. Что такое классика? М.: Искусство XXI век, 2004. 512 с.

Хомяков А. С. Полное собрание сочинений: в 8 т. М.: Университетская типография на Страстном бульваре, 1900. Т. 8. 543 с.

Федотов Г. П. Судьба и грехи России. Избранные статьи по философии русской истории и культуры: в 2 т. СПб.: София, 1991. Т. 2. 348 с.

Кожинов В. В. Контрреволюция, осуществляемая «по-революционному»… // Социальная история общественной науки: электронная библиотека и архив. URL: http://old.ihst.ru/projects/sohist/papers/kojinov.htm (дата обращения: 01.08.2018).

Леонтьев К. Н. Чем и как либерализм наш вреден? // Леонтьев К. Н. Избранное. М.: РОССПЭН, 2010. С. 483–503.

Бердяев Н. А. Миросозерцание Достоевского. М.: АСТ, 2006. 254 с.

Модернизация в России и конфликт ценностей / отв. ред. С. Я. Матвеева. М.: ИФРАН, 1994.

Жижек С. Тринадцать опытов о Ленине // Критическая масса. 2003. № 2. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/km/2003/2/zhizh.html (дата обращения: 01.08.2018).

Бердяев Н. А. Философия неравенства. М.: Институт русской цивилизации, 2012. 624 с.

Шелохаев В. Предисловие // Вехи: Интеллигенция в России: сборник статей 1909–1910. М.: Молодая гвардия, 1991. С. 5–21.

Масарик Т. Г. Либерализм // О свободе. Антология мировой либеральной мысли (первая половина 20 века). М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. С. 201–219.

References

Arslanov, V. G. (2004), “K chitatelju etoi knigi” [To reader of this book], in Lifshits, M. A. Chto takoe klassika? [What is classic?], Iskusstvo — XXI vek [Art of XXI century], Moscow, Russia, pp. 7–30.

Vishnevskii, A. G. (1998), Serp i rubl’: konservativnaia modernizatsiia v SSSR [Sickle and rouble: conservative modernization in USSR], OGI Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Nadtochii, E. V. (2014), “Timur i ego arcane: sotsial’no-antropologicheskoe znachenie sovetskoi revoliutsii “detstva” v 1920–30-e gody” [Timur and his arcane: social and anthropological meaning of soviet revolution of childhood in 1920–1930s], Sotsiologiia vlasti, no. 3, pp. 81–98.

Lifshits, M. A. (2004), Chto takoe klassika? [What is classic?], Iskusstvo — XXI vek [Art of XXI century], Moscow, Russia.

Khomiakov, A. S. (1900), Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Completed Works], in 8 vols. Universitetskaia tipografiia na Strastnom bul’vare, Moscow, vol. 8.

Fedotov, G. P. (1991), Sud’ba i grekhi Rossii. Izbrannye stat’i po filosofii russkoi istorii i kul’tury [The destiny and sins of Russia. Selected articles], in 2 vols. Sofiia Publ., St. Petersburg, Russia.

Kozhinov, V. V. (1998), “Kontrrevoliutsiia, osushchestvliaemaia ‘po-revoliutsionnomu’” [Contrrevolution realized “revolutionary”], in Sotsial’naia istoriia obshchestvennoi nauki: elektronnaia biblioteka i arkhiv [Social history of social science: electronic library and archive], available at: http://old.ihst.ru/projects/sohist/papers/kojinov.htm (Accessed 1 August 2018).

Leont’ev, K. N. (1996), “Chem i kak liberalizm nash vreden?” [By what and how our liberalism is harmful?], in Leont’ev, K. N. Izbrannoe [Selected works], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.

Berdiaev, N. A. (2006), Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s worldview], AST Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Matveeva, S. Ia. (ed.) (1994), Modernizatsiia v Rossii i konflikt tsennostei [The modernization in Russia and conflict of values], IFRAN, Moscow, Russia.

Žižek, S. (2003) “Trinadtsat’ opytov o Lenine” [The thirteen essayes about Lenin], Kriticheskaia massa, no. 2, available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/km/2003/2/zhizh.html (Accessed 1 August 2018).

Berdiaev, N. A. (2012), Filosofiia neravenstva [The philosophy of inequality], Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, Moscow, Russia.

Shelokhaev, V. (1991), “Predislovie” [Preface], in Vekhi: Intelligentsiia v Rossii: sbornik statei 1909–1910 [The landmarks: intelligentsia in Russia: Collected articles 1909–1910], Molodaia gvardiia, Moscow, Russia.

Masarik, T. G. (2000), “Liberalizm” [Liberalism], in O svobode. Antologiia mirovoi liberal’noi mysli (pervaia polovina 20 veka) [About liberty. Anthology of world liberal thought (the first half of XX century)], Progress-Traditsiia, Moscow, Russia.

Published

2019-03-27

How to Cite

Камнев, В. М., & Камнева, Л. С. (2019). The phenomenon of the Soviet conservatism: historiosophical justification. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.104

Most read articles by the same author(s)