The Oxford movement studies: Main historiographical problems and trends

Authors

  • Mikhail S. Stetckevich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Tatiana V. Chumakova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Sergei Frolov Southern Methodist University, 6424 Robert S. Hyer Lane, Dallas, Texas, 75275, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.411

Abstract

The article analyzes the main trends in the historiography of the Oxford (Traсtarian) movement in the Church of England, which had a significant impact not only on its subsequent development, but also on the evolution of Anglicanism as a whole. The purpose of the article is to identify the key trends in the development of the historiography of the Oxford movement and to distinguish the range of problems studied by researchers, focusing on the most controversial issues. The article aims to analyze the works of the authors who reviewed the history of the Oxford movement in the context of the evolution of the Church of England (N. Gash, O. Chadwick, P. Avis, S. Brown), and researchers who focused on the phenomenon of Tractarianism itself (M. O’Connell, J. Griffin, J. Rowlands, P. Nockles, J. Pereiro, G. Herring). The authors of the article used problem-chronological and comparative methods, which allow for the presentation of the main historiographical achievements in their dynamic development. It can be concluded that the confessionalism expressed in the representation of the Tractarian leaders either as “saviors” of the Church of England, or as “traitors” who sought to bring it into the bosom of the Roman Catholic Church, has been completely overcome. A significant research consensus was reached on issues such as the date of the movement’s origin, its revolutionary nature and connection with the High Church tradition, and the importance of the influence of Tractarianism on the subsequent evolution of Anglicanism. Issues such as the relationship of Tractarianism with the Ritualists movement remains debatable. Further prospects for the study of the Oxford movement primarily concern the study of its perception by British society, and investigation of its international dimension (in particular, Russian)

Keywords:

The Oxford movement, Tractarianism, The Church of England, historiography, Anglicanism, religious studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Crumb, L. (2009), The Oxford Movement and Its Leaders: A Bibliography of Secondary and Lesser Primary Sources, 2nd ed., Scarecrow Press, Lanham.

2. Santos Sotelo, V. (1988). The leading Interpretations on the Significance and Nature of the Oxford movement, Abstract of PhD. dissertation, University of Navarra, Pamplona.

3. Nockles, P. B. (1994), The Oxford Movement in Context: Anglican High Churchmanship, 1760–1857. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

4. Skinner, S. (2004), Tractarians and the ‘condition of England’: the social and political thought of the Oxford Movement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

5. Church, R. W. (1897), The Oxford Movement: Twelve years 1833–1845, Macmillan and Co, London.

6. Palmer, W. (1843), A Narrative of Events connected with the publication of the Tracts for the Times, John Henry Parker, Oxford, UK.

7. Palmer, W. (1883), A Narrative of Events connected with the publication of the Tracts for the Times, Rivingtons, London.

8. Newman, J. H. (1864), Apologia pro Vita Sua, Appleton and Co, New York.

9. Liddon, H. P., Life of Edward Bouverie Pusey, vols. 1–4, Longmans, London.

10. Brown, S., Nockles, P. and Pereiro, J. (ed.) (2017), The Oxford Handbook of the Oxford movement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

11. Keble, J. National Apostasy Considered in a Sermon Preached in St. Mary’s, Oxford, before His Majesty’s Judges of Assize, on Sunday, July 14, 1833 (1833), J. H. Parker, Oxford.

12. Ollard, S. (1915), A Short History of the Oxford Movement, A. R. Mowbray and Co, London.

13. Walsh, W. (1898), The Secret History of the Oxford Movement, Swan Sonnenschein, London.

14. Walsh, W. (1900), The History of the Romeward Movement in the Church of England, 1833–1864, James Nisbet, London.

15. Heroes of the Catholic Revival (1933), Catholic Literature Association, London.

16. Morse-Boycott, D. (1933), Lead, Kindly Light: Studies of the Saints and Heroes of the Oxford Movement, Macmillan, New York.

17. Atherstone, A. (2013) “Evangelicals and the Oxford Movement Centenary”, Journal of Religious History, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 98–117.

18. Dawson, C. (1945), The Spirit of the Oxford Movement, Sheed and Ward, London.

19. Brilioth, Y. (1933), The Anglican Revival: Studies in the Oxford Movement, Longmans, Green, London.

20. Gash, N. (1965), Reaction and Reconstruction in English Politics, 1832–1852. The Ford Lectures Delivered in The University of Oxford in the Hilary Term 1964, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

21. Chadwick, O. (1987), The Victorian Church, vol. 1, SCM Press Ltd, UK.

22. Bowen, D. (1968), The Idea of the Victorian Church: a Study of the Church of England, 1833–1889, McGill University Press, Montreal.

23. Parsons, G. (1988), “Reform, Revival and Realignment: The Experience of Victorian Anglicanism”, in Parsons, G. (ed.), Religion in Victorian Britain, vol. I Traditions, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 15–65.

24. Gibson, W. (1994), Church, State and Society, 1760–1850, Macmillan, London.

25. Pattison, R. (1991), The Great Dissent. John Henry Newman and the Liberal Heresy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

26. Brown, S. (2001), The National Churches of England, Ireland and Scotland, 1801–1846, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

27. Avis, P. (2002), Anglicanism and the Christian Church. Theological Resources in Historical Perspective, Continuum, London.

28. О’Connell, M. (1969), The Oxford Conspirators: A History of the Oxford Movement, 1833–1845, Macmillan, London.

29. Chadwick, O. (1960), The Mind of the Oxford Movement, A & C Black Publishers Ltd, London.

30. Griffin, J. R. (1980), The Oxford Movement: A Revision. Christendom Publications, Front Royal, Virginia.

31. Griffin, J. R. (1976), “The Radical Phase of the Oxford Movement”, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 47–56.

32. Rowlands, J. (1989), Church, State and Society. The Attitudes of John Keble, Richard Hurrell Froude and John Henry Newman, 1827–1845, Churchman Publishing Ltd, Worthing.

33. Herring, G. (2002), What was the Oxford Movement?, Continuum, London.

34. Yates, N. (1983), The Oxford Movement and Anglican Ritualism, The Historical Association, London.

35. Herring, G. (2016), The Oxford Movement in Practice: The Tractarian Parochial Worlds from the 1830s to the 1870s, University Press, Oxford.

36. Brad Faught, C. (2003), The Oxford Movement. A Thematic History of the Tractarians and their Times, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.

37. Pereiro, J (2008). Ethos and the Oxford Movement: At the Heart of Tractarianism, University Press, Oxford.

38. Brown, S., Nockles, P. (eds.), (2012), The Oxford Movement: Europe and the Wider World, 1830–1930, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-27

How to Cite

Stetckevich, M. S., Chumakova, T. V., & Frolov, S. (2019). The Oxford movement studies: Main historiographical problems and trends. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.411

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Religious studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.

Most read articles by the same author(s)