Drug users as a party and aim to the conflict between state and illicit market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2018.410Abstract
The paper analyses the complex counteraction between modern state and illicit drug market. Considering the different scientific views on the role of drug users in the drug trafficking
chain, the author points out that main problem of conflict interpretation of drug use is that without a correct localization of the place and role of the drug user in the state vs. drug market conflict, it is impossible to conduct scientifically substantiated examination of such conflicts. In a practical sense, this significantly affects the formation of the legislative framework for combating drug trafficking. The author assumes that drug users can be a subject of conflicts between the state and the drug market, and the object of some of them. The problem of finding a correct control regime for a drug user is posed as a measure, without which it is impossible to effectively combat the drug. Analysis of international experience has shown that drug use can be: 1) criminalized and thus included in drug trafficking; 2) is not included in the illicit traffic of drugs, but is prohibited indirectly, through the criminalization of acts accompanying consumption; 3) separated by the state from the illicit drug market and thereby legalized. The results of a study of the historical evolution of the Russian anti-drug policy from the late imperial period to the present time are presented. The author concludes that, despite the fact that its core is consumer control, law enforcement practice is focused on combating large-scale drug trafficking. It proposes supplementing the basic and normative documents regulating relations in the sphere of illicit drug trafficking with the concept of a “drug user”, which will make it possible to include drug use in the sphere of state control.
Keywords:
illicit drugs, drug use, drug trafficking, state, conflict, anti-drug policy
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Николаев К. Д. Объект и предмет преступлений, связанных с незаконным оборотом наркотиков // Вестник Воронежского института МВД России. 2009. No 4. С. 42–46.
Зазулин Г.В. Наркоэпидемия. Политика. Менеджмент. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2003. 288 с.
Лунеев В.В. Преступность XX века: мировые, региональные и российские тенденции. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2005. 912 с.
Зазулин Г. В., Стребков А. И. Что такое наркоконфликтология // Конфликтология. 2009. Вып. 2. С. 160–178.
Гилинский Я. И. Профессорская лекция по теме «Криминология и девиантология» // Российский криминологический взгляд. 2010. No 2. С. 239–260.
Stevens A., Berto D., Frick U., Kerschl V., McSweeney T., Schaaf S., Tartari M., Turnbull P., Trinkl B., Uchtenhagen A., Waidner G., Werdenich W. The Victimization of Dependent Drug Users // European Journal of Criminology. 2007. Vol. 4, is. 4. P. 385–408.
Agozino B. Theorizing otherness, the war on drugs and incarceration // Theoretical Criminology. 2000. Vol. 4, is. 3. P. 359–376.
Lynch M. Theorizing the role of the ‘war on drugs’ in US punishment // Theoretical Criminology. 2012. Vol. 16, is. 2. P. 175–199.
Rajkumar A. S., French M. T. Drug Abuse, Crime Costs, and the Economic Benefits of Treatment // Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 1997. Vol. 13, N 3. P. 291–323.
Rhodes W., Kling R., Johnston P. Using Booking Data to Model Drug User Arrest Rates: A Preliminary to Estimating the Prevalence of Chronic Drug Use // Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2007. Vol. 23. P. 1–22.
Welsh W. N., Zajac G., Bucklen K. B. For whom does prison-based drug treatment work? Results from a randomized experiment // Journal of Experimental Criminology . 2004. Vol. 10. P. 151–177.
Чумакова Т. В. Наркотики и религия // Человек вчера и сегодня: междисциплинарные исследования. М.: ИФРАН, 2008. 249 с.
Сунами А.Н. Конфликт ценностей как социально-философское основание борьбы государства с наркорынком // Вестник СПбГУ. Сер. Философия и конфликтология. 2017. Т. 33, вып. 3. С. 381–388.
Газимагомедов Г. Г., Сунами А. Н. Наркоконфликт и конфликтная ответственность — новые понятия конфликтологии // Конфликтология. 2012. Вып. 1. С. 54–72.
Зазулин Г. В., Сунами А. Н. (отв. ред.) Антинаркотическая политика: шведские ответы на российские вопросы. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2008. 386 с.
Сорокина Т. Н. Из истории борьбы с опиекурением на русском Дальнем Востоке в 1910–1915 гг. // Исторический ежегодник. Омск: Изд-во Омск. ун-та, 1996. С. 39–45.
Ткаченко В. В., Ткаченко С. В. Уголовная ответственность за незаконный оборот наркотиков. Барнаул: Сизиф, 2011. 164 с.
Фролова Н. А., Зазулин Г. В. Актуальные вопросы антинаркотической политики: отечественный и зарубежный опыт. М.: Орбита-М, 2003. 272 с.
Seddon T. Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues // Criminology & Criminal justice. 2007. Vol. 7, is. 3. P. 269–286.
Алейников А. В., Стребков А. И., Сунами А. Н. Мнение населения о проблеме употребления наркотиков как социально-гигиенический фактор // Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2015. No 3. С. 7–11.
Rempel M., Green M., Kralstein D. The impact of adult drug courts on crime and incarceration: findings from a multi-site quasi-experimental design // Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2012. Vol. 8. P. 165–192.
References
Nikolaev, K. D. (2009), “Object and subject of drug trafficking crimes”, Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii, vol. 4, pp. 42–46.
Zazulin, G. V. (2003), Narkoepidemiia. Politika. Menedzhment [Drug epidemic. Policy. Management], St. Petersburg University Press, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Luneev, V. V. (2005), Prestupnost’ XX veka: mirovye, regional’nye i rossiiskie tendentsii [Crime of the 20th century: global, regional and Russian tendencies], Walters Cloover, Moscow, Russia.
Zazulin, G. V. and Strebkov, A. I. (2009), “What does drug conflictology mean?”, Konfliktologiia, vol. 2, pp. 160–178.
Gilinskii, Ia. I. (2010), “Professor’s lecture on criminology and deviantology”, Rossiiskii kriminologicheskii vzgliad, vol. 2, pp. 239–260.
Stevens, A., Berto D., Frick, U., Kerschl, V., McSweeney, T., Schaaf, S., Tartari, M., Turnbull, P., Trinkl, B., Uchtenhagen, A., Waidner, G., and Werdenich, W. (2007), “The Victimization of Dependent Drug Users”, European Journal of Criminology, vol. 4, is. 4, pp. 385–408.
Agozino, B. (2000), “Theorizing otherness, the war on drugs and incarceration”, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 4, is. 3, pp. 359–376.
Lynch, M. (2012), “Theorizing the role of the ‘war on drugs’ in US punishment”, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 16, is. 2, pp. 175–199.
Rajkumar, A. S. and French, M. T. (1997), “Drug Abuse, Crime Costs, and the Economic Benefits of Treatment”, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 291–323.
Rhodes, W., Kling, R. and Johnston, P. (2007), “Using Booking Data to Model Drug User Arrest Rates: A Preliminary to Estimating the Prevalence of Chronic Drug Use”, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, vol. 23, pp. 1–22.
Welsh, W. N., Zajac, G. and Bucklen, K. B. (2004), “For whom does prison-based drug treatment work? Results from a randomized experiment”, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 10, pp. 151–177.
Chumakova, T. V. (2008), “Drugs and religion”, in Chelovek vchera i segodnia: mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniia [Man yesterday and today: interdisciplinary research], IFRAN, Moscow, Russia, pp. 80–89.
Sunami A. N. (2017), “Conflict of values as a socio-philosophical basis of state’s war on illicit drug market”, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict studies, vol. 33, is. 3, pp. 381–388.
Gazimagomedov, G. G. and Sunami, A. N. (2012), “Drug conflict and conflict responsibility as a new terms of the conflict studies”, Konfliktologiia, vol. 1, pp. 54–72.
Zazulin G. V. and Sunami, A. N. (eds.) (2008), Antinarkoticheskaia politika: shvedskie otvety na rossiiskie voprosy y [Anti-drug policy: Swedish answers for Russian questions], St. Petersburg University Press, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Sorokina, T. N. (1996), “From the history of the struggle against smoking opium in the Russian Far East in the 1910–1915”, Istoricheskii ezhegodnik, Izd-vo Omsk. un-ta, Omsk, Russia, pp. 39–45.
Tkachenko, V. V. and Tkachenko, S. V. (2011), Ugolovnaia otvetstvennost’ za nezakonnyi oborot narkotikov [Criminal liability for drug trafficking], Sizif Publ., Barnaul, Russia.
Frolova, N. A. and Zazulin, G. V. (2003), Aktual’nye voprosy antinarkoticheskoi politiki: otechestvennyi i zarubezhnyi opyt [Topical issues of drug policy: domestic and foreign experience], Orbita-M Publ., Moscow, Russia.
Seddon, T. (2007), Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues, Criminology & Criminal justice, vol. 7, is. 3, pp. 269–286.
Aleinikov, A. V., Strebkov, A. I. and Sunami, A. N. (2015), “The opinion of population concerning issue of drug use as a social hygienic factor”, Problemy sotsial’noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniia i istorii meditsiny, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 7–11.
Rempel, M., Green, M. and Kralstein, D. (2012), “The impact of adult drug courts on crime and incarceration: findings from a multi-site quasi-experimental design”, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 8, pp. 165–192.
Downloads
Published
2019-01-15
How to Cite
Сунами, А. Н., & Крюкова, К. В. (2019). Drug users as a party and aim to the conflict between state and illicit market. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2018.410
Issue
Section
Conflict studies
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
