Конфликт ценностей как социально-философское основание борьбы государства с наркорынком

Артем Николаевич Сунами

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.314

Authors

Артем Николаевич Сунами St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.314

Abstract

The paper analyses the complex counteraction between the modern state and the illicit drug market. Applying the conflict studies approach to the analysis of the current situation in the state war on drugs, the author points out that the interpretation of the state and the illicit drug market as parties in a conflict of interests makes it possible to identify the most significant characteristics of their relations as interdependent, to examine the medical and law enforcement activities against the drug market and to forecast the result of the anti-drug policy. The article summarizes well-known approaches, it notes that the state, due to its inherent specific responsibility, has a set of interests related to the preservation and enhancement of the common good, and also acts as the main investor in human capital. Conflict of interest arises when the activities of drug dealers, whose private interest consists in extracting profits from the sale of a dangerous product, start to influence human capital so negatively that the state is forced to manifest the incompatibility of its interests with the drug market and initiate a war on drugs. The article analyzes the tendency of the gradual prevalence of the conflict of values over the conflict of interests in the interaction between the state and the illicit drug market. It opines that the irrationalization of the conflict between the state and the illicit drug market is one of the reasons for the observed equalization of the capabilities and power of the parties. The author concludes that only the return of the conflict to the basic state of the conflict of interests is able to connect the anti-drug activity of the state with the real interests of civil society again. Refs 16.

Keywords:

conflict, state, illicit drug market, human value, conflict of values, anti-drug policy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Зазулин Г. В., Стребков А. И. Что такое наркоконфликтология // Конфликтология. 2009. № 2. С. 156–180.

Dahrendorf R. The modern social conflict: An essay on the politics of liberty. Berkeley; Los Angeles, California University Press, 1988. 219 p.

Газимагомедов Г. Г. Рынок и политика: конфликтные грани взаимодействия // Вестник С.-Петерб. ун-та. Сер. 6. 2005. Вып. 3. С. 38–42.

Спиридонова В. И. Эволюция концепции общего блага в западной политической мысли. // Полигнозис. 2001. № 1 (13). С. 41–52.

Parsons T. The System of Modern Societies. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1971. 152 p.

Durkheim E. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press, 2014. 416 p.

Сунами А. Н. Конфликтология ответственности // Вестник С.-Петерб. ун-та. Сер. 17. 2013. Вып. 3. С. 50–57.

Schultz T. Investment in Human Capital. The Role of Education and of Research. New York: The Free Press; London: Collier-Macmillan Limited, 1971. 272 p.

Becker G. S. Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964. 187 p.

Розмаинский И. В. Почему капитал здоровья накапливается в развитых странах и «проедается» в постсоветской России? (Опыт посткейнсианского анализа) // Вопросы экономики. 2011. № 10. С. 113–131.

Сунами А. Н., Рукинов В. А. Аксиологическое измерение антинаркотической политики // Конфликтология. 2015. № 1. С. 95–104.

Rowe T. C. Federal Narcotics Laws and the War on Drugs: Money Down a Rat Hole. New York: Haworth Press, 2006. 198 p.

Стребков А. И., Сунами А. Н. Междисциплинарная парадигма анализа конфликтов ценностей // Конфликтология. 2016. № 4. С. 48–66.

Зазулин Г. В. Наркоситуация и конфликтогенный потенциал наркореальности в России // Конфликтология. 2014. Специальный выпуск. С. 381–384.

Block W. Defending the Undefendable. New York: Fleet Press Corp., 1976. 256 p.

Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 344 p.

References

Zazulin G. V., Strebkov A. I. Chto takoe narkokonfliktologiia [What is drug conflict studies]? Konfliktologiia, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 156–180. (In Russian)

Dahrendorf R. The modern social conflict: An essay on the politics of liberty. Berkeley, Los Angeles, California University Press, 1988. 219 p.

Gazimagomedov G. G. Rynok i politika: konfliktnye grani vzaimodeistviia [Market and policy: Conflict aspects of interaction]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 6, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 38–42. (In Russian)

Spiridonova V. I. Evoliutsiia kontseptsii obshchego blaga v zapadnoi politicheskoi mysli [The evolution of the concept of the common good in Western political thought]. Polignozis, 2001, vol. 1 (13), pp. 41–52. (In Russian)

Parsons T. The System of Modern Societies. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1971. 152 p.

Durkheim E. The Division of Labor in Society. New York, Free Press, 2014. 416 p.

Sunami A. N. Konfliktologiia otvetstvennosti [Conflict studies of the responsibility]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17, 2013, vol. 3, pp. 50–57. (In Russian)

Schultz T. Investment in Human Capital. The Role of Education and of Research. New York, The Free Press, London, Collier-Macmillan Limited, 1971. 272 p.

Becker G. S. Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York, Columbia University Press, 1964. 187 p.

Rozmainskii I. V. Pochemu kapital zdorov’ia nakaplivaetsia v razvitykh stranakh i “proedaetsia” v postsovetskoi Rossii? (opyt postkeinsianskogo analiza) [Why health capital accumulates in developed countries and “eats” in post-soviet Russia? (Experience of post-Keynesian analysis)]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 113–131. (In Russian)

Sunami A. N., Rukinov V. A . Aksiologicheskoe izmerenie antinarkoticheskoi politiki [Axiology of Anti-Drug Policy]. Konfliktologiia, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 95–104. (In Russian)

Rowe T. C. Federal Narcotics Laws and the War on Drugs: Money Down a Rat Hole. New York, Haworth Press, 2006. 198 p.

Strebkov A. I., Sunami A. N. Mezhdistsiplinarnaia paradigma analiza konfliktov tsennostei [Interdisciplinary paradigm for “conflict of values” analysis]. Konfliktologiia, 2016, vol. 4, pp. 48–66. (In Russian)

Zazulin G. V. Narkosituatsiia i konfliktogennyi potentsial narkoreal’nosti v Rossii [Drug situation and conflict potential of drug reality in Russia]. Konfliktologiia, 2014, special issue, pp. 381–384. (In Russian)

Block W. Defending the Undefendable. New York, Fleet Press Corp., 1976. 256 p.

Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005. 344 p.